Compassionate Release Motions and Decisions by Jurisdiction Filter Results Active Content Filter X Cases & Briefs Filter by Project 4th Amendment Center (4) Cannabis Justice Initiative (8) Case Tracker (59) Excessive Sentencing Project (2) Federal Compassionate Release Clearinghouse (2) Policing and Overcriminalization of Pregnancy (4) Return to Freedom Project (2) Filter by Topic Amicus Briefs (335) Amicus keywords (290) Compassionate Release (102) Coronavirus (51) COVID-19 (51) Excessive Sentencing (58) Fifth Amendment (53) Forensic Science (63) Fourth Amendment (106) Legal Documents Library (84) Overcriminalization (72) Public Health (51) Sentencing (245) Sixth Amendment (155) White Collar (162) Filter by Jurisdiction Federal Court (529) U.S. States and Territories (212) United States Supreme Court (462) 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (64) 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals (39) 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (79) 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (33) 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (42) 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (31) 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (105) 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (40) 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (28) District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals (34) New York (31) D.D.C. (21) Filter by US Code 18 U.S.C. 111 (32) 18 U.S.C. 871 (2) 18 U.S.C. 875 (2) 18 U.S.C. 46307 (1) 18 U.S.C. 1865(a) (1) 18 U.S.C. 922 (3) 18 U.S.C. 371 (2) 18 U.S.C. 119 (1) 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) (1) 18 U.S.C. 1001(a)(2) (1) 18 U.S.C. 1505 (2) 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)(1) (4) 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) (1) 18 U.S.C. 641 (1) 40 U.S.C. 1315 (1) 18 U.S.C. 1382 (3) 50 U.S.C. 797 (3) 18 U.S.C. 1361 (1) 18 U.S.C. 1071 (1) 8 U.S.C. 1324 (1) 18 U.S.C. 2 (1) 18 U.S.C. 373 (1) 18 U.S.C. 1344 (1) 18 U.S.C. 1014 (1) 18 U.S.C. 1958 (1) 18 U.S.C. 924 (1) 18 U.S.C. 2119 (1) 18 U.S.C. 2113 (1) Filter by Case Outcome Acquittal - Bench (2) Acquittal - Jury (11) Dismissal - without Prejudice (15) Dismissal with Prejudice (16) Guilty - Jury (1) Guilty Plea (1) No Bill - further action (1) No Bill - no further action (1) Recharged at Lower Level (1) Filter by AUSA Alexander, Keith (1) Andrews, Shawn, T. (1) Anthony, Stephen E. (1) Arakawa, Jordan (1) Barclay, Michael, L. (1) Border, Lauren, E. (1) Bove, Jessica (1) Bradford, Scott (1) Brandley, George (1) Carney, Caelainn (1) Castaneda, Patrick (1) Chang, Stephen (1) Chapman, Timothy, J. (1) Countryman, Phillip D. (1) Ellis, Michael, J.A. (1) Eppel, Solomon (1) Essayli, Bilal, A. (1) Galvan, Brenda, N. (1) Gardner, Grant (1) Green, Jacob, M. (1) Halligan, Lindsey (2) Havey, Brian, R. (1) Henek , David T. (1) Hennessy, Sean (1) Hitt, Jason (1) Hogan, William, Jr., R. (1) Howland, Christopher, R. (1) Keller, Roger (1) Kibbe, Patrick, D. (1) Lee, Sonah (1) Levy, Mark (1) Lewis, Frances, S. (1) Macey, Christine, M. (1) McCarren, Mark, J. (1) McQuire, Robert (1) Miller, Brian (1) Mulroe, Conor (1) Naseef, Kate, M. (1) Payano, Iricel, E. (1) Pelt, Erin, V. (1) Perez De La Rosa , Jr., Alfredo (1) Pirro, Jeanine, F. (1) Ranney, Sarah, C. (1) Sabir, Sehar, F. (1) Satter, Joshua (1) Shah, Milind, M. (1) Sleeper, Adam, F. (1) Smith, Kenneth, M. (1) Snell, Jeffrey, S. (2) Srinivasan, Girish, K. (1) Strong, Thomas, G. (1) Thakor, Neil (1) Thompson, Alison (1) Tonkin, Elizabeth (1) Wannarka, Sarah (1) Webman, Aaron L. (1) Williams, Courtney, N. (1) Wolf, Travis (1) Showing 61 - 75 of 1255 results Newest Oldest Relevance Cases & Briefs United States v. Ramos-Brito Defendant pushed a federal agent in the chest at a protest. Cases & Briefs United States v. Stinson The defendant, a 33-year Coast Guard veteran and self-described member of Antifa, made threats against President Trump. He was acquitted at trial. Cases & Briefs United States v. Orellana The defendant was distributing face shields and masks at a protest against ICE. Cases & Briefs United States v. McIver Congresswoman alleged to have pushed against federal agents seeking to arrest Mayor of Newark outside ICE facility. Cases & Briefs Villarreal v. Texas Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner Cases & Briefs United States v. Huerta The defendant is alleged to have led protests that blocked ICE vehicles engaged in a raid. Cases & Briefs Barrett v. United States Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner Cases & Briefs State v. Tybear Miles Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Electronic Privacy Information Center, and Electronic Frontier Foundation as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant–Appellant. Cases & Briefs United States v. Abrego Garcia A case alleging human smuggling against a Salvadoran man after his highly publicized deportation was deemed illegal. The Court has preliminarily ruled that there is a "realistic likelihood of vindictive prosecution" and has scheduled an evidentiary hearing on the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution. Cases & Briefs United States v. Parviz Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. Cases & Briefs United States v. Burger Threats of a possible terrorist attack at a Christian concert were made by 21- year-old while he was playing a character in a video game. Cases & Briefs United States v. Escobedo-Molina Defendant crossed the U.S.-Mexico border region designated as a National Defense Area and was thereby charged with criminal violations of trespassing on a military reservation in addition to illegal entry. Cases & Briefs United States v. Toirov Defendant illegally entered the United States (to which he immediately pled guilty and was sentenced to time served) and was granted bail by the magistrate judge on two counts of trespassing on military property. The United States appealed the decision to grant bail, but the Tenth Circuit upheld the district court's bail decision. Cases & Briefs United States v. Tamup-Tamup During the course of an attempted apprehension of defendant, an illegal alien, the defendant resisted arrest, flailing his arms in an attempt to get away, causing the DHS agent to fall, twisting her ankle (later, per the complaint, determined to be a leg fracture). Cases & Briefs United States v. Diaz-Amezcua Defendant, a removable immigrant, was alleged to have elbowed a Customs and Border Patrol agent in the face, causing bodily injury, when being arrested at his home by a CBP agent. This is a sponsored adMyCaseManage Your Law Firm All in One Place Featured Products 2025 Year-End Ethics Grab Earn your ethics credits for 2025 by learning from some of the best criminal defense attorneys in the country! This comprehensive year-end ethics program brings together three of NACDL’s most practical and timely presentations—helping defense lawyers meet their ethics credit requirements while sharpening their understanding of the professional challenges facing today’s practice. This special compilation includes the highest-rated legal ethics presentations delivered at NACDL conferences in 2025! Using AI for Trial Preparation: Managing Overwhelming Caseloads This 1-hour program shows defense lawyers how to use AI to tame heavy caseloads while staying ethical. Learn to auto-summarize discovery into timelines, relationship maps, and contradiction charts; draft and refine cross-exams; analyze juror questionnaires; and test case theories. Set up workflows and agents to monitor law, media, and social posts. Build simple custom trial tools. Leverage sentencing data for mitigation. Includes confidentiality, verification, and disclosure best practices to boost accuracy and save hours weekly. Pozner's Red Book on Cross: Lessons in Advanced Cross-Examination This compact handbook brings together over 20 of Larry Pozner’s most powerful cross-examination articles, covering core principles and advanced strategies for witness control, impeachment, chaptering, and framing reasonable doubt. Packed with scripting examples, real-world scenarios, and tactical insight, it shows how to press or pivot with purpose, drop weak points, and keep cross disciplined. Whether dismantling an officer’s account, challenging an eyewitness, or exposing investigative gaps, Pozner’s field manual delivers courtroom-ready tools to win. Exposing Lies and False Testimony in Criminal Trials When a case hinges on credibility, the lawyer who can expose a lie controls the outcome. This program delivers a courtroom-ready system to detect deception, dismantle false testimony, and turn credibility attacks into acquittals or favorable pleas. Learn research-backed methods to spot dishonesty in interviews, build an impeachment toolkit under the rules of evidence, and craft narratives that reveal bias, motive, and contradictions—arming you to challenge police, experts, informants, and eyewitnesses with precision. Objections That Stick! How to Exclude, Preserve, and Persuade If you’re not objecting, you might be conceding—learn how to stop giving ground. This program delivers practical strategies for making effective objections in criminal trials, especially drug cases. Learn how to challenge hearsay, 404(b) evidence, improper opinions, and prejudicial testimony. You’ll get objection language, methods for preserving error, and tactics for handling misconduct in closing arguments. With real-world examples and trial-tested tools, this program helps defense attorneys sharpen courtroom advocacy and protect the record for appeal. Combating the "Rape Myth" Expert: Excluding & Diffusing Expert Testimony When the prosecution uses a “rape myth” expert to sway the jury, do you know how to stop them—and turn their science against them? This program, based on a real trial, gives defense attorneys a practical roadmap to challenge and exclude biased psychological testimony. You’ll get sample voir dire, motion language, Daubert strategies, and tips for exposing flawed methodology and narrowing testimony. Whether you're aiming to exclude the expert or limit their impact, this session equips you with the tools to protect your client and assert control in the courtroom. Pattern Cross-Examination for Digital Forensic Experts This guide provides ready-to-use cross-examination questions, categorized by artifact type and case theme—from cell phone towers to deleted texts to smart devices and cloud forensics. Whether you’re handling a case involving child exploitation, stalking, or online fraud, this book delivers practical patterns designed to highlight sloppy forensics, bias, tool limitations, and assumptions of intent or identity. Defense attorneys don’t need a computer science degree—they need strategy, control, and the right questions to challenge the illusion of digital certainty in court. Using Chat GPT in Criminal Cases - Writing Better Prompts Want a motion written in plain language but grounded in Tennessee case law? Need a summary of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence with primary and secondary citations? This is where you learn how to get that—on demand, and with far less editing. This training is designed specifically for attorneys—busy professionals who need fast, accurate, and case-relevant AI support. Whether you’re drafting motions, brainstorming legal strategy, summarizing complex case law, or preparing cross-examinations, the quality of your AI output comes down to one thing: how you ask for it. Alcohol, Blackouts and Consent in Sex Cases This comprehensive training program provides defense attorneys with a rigorous, science-backed approach to dismantling prosecutorial narratives, exposing unreliable testimony, and ensuring that juries are properly educated on the complexities of memory, intoxication, and consent. You'll explores critical mistakes and misconceptions encountered in these cases, including errors in memory reconstruction after an event, incorrect inferences, cognitive schemas, suggestibility, contamination and misinformation, mistakes of fact and more. Overcoming the Presumption of Guilt and Defining Reasonable Doubt Reasonable Doubt, what is it? In order to win criminal cases, the defense practitioner must object to a reasonable doubt standard that lowers the burden of guilt. This program will discuss proven methods to argue and define reasonable doubt persuasively to a jury. You’ll learn how define reasonable doubt using metaphors and hypothetical scenarios that force juries to dispute the evidence, conflicts in the evidence, or even lack of evidence in your case. The DIY of DNA: Exoneration Through DNA Evidence This presentation might be the first time you’re truly able to truly grasp the fundamentals of DNA evidence. This critical presentation blends real-world storytelling with clear, practical instruction—making DNA evidence finally feel accessible, even to non-scientists—while inspiring attorneys to dig deeper, ask smarter questions, and approach forensic science with newfound confidence. You’ll learn how to identify and interpret electropherograms, understand autosomal vs. Y-STR testing, and recognize the limits of DNA evidence—particularly when it involves partial or mixed samples. Upcoming Events Featured Events 18 Feb 2026 2026 Midwinter Meeting & Seminar 19 Feb 2026 2026 Midwinter Seminar - LIVESTREAM 25 Feb 2026 Influencing the Algorithm: Brand Strategies for the AI Age 23 Apr 2026 2026 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar