According to the Sentencing Project, overall juvenile placements fell 54% between 2001 and 2015, with reductions in numbers for white, Black, Latinx, and Native youth. Yet because white placements declined at a faster rate, significant existing racial disparities in juvenile placements widened even further. The racial disparity between Black and white youth in custody increased by 22%-- Black youth were more than five times as likely to be detained or committed than were white youth in 2015 (September 2017). During that time, racial disparities increased in 37 states and declined in 13 states. The disparity between Native and white youth increased nationally by 14% between 2001 and 2015, but in some states the disparity grew more dramatically, so much as doubling in Arizona (October 2017).
Broad discretion across the juvenile justice system means that implicit, and sometimes explicit, bias can manifest in decisions spanning the entire juvenile justice process. A 2017 report out of the Center on Poverty and Inequity at Georgetown Law examines the disparate treatment of Black girls by various system actors:
- Black girls are 2.7 times more likely than white girls to be referred to juvenile justice and are 1.2 times more likely to be detained.
- Black girls are three times more likely to be removed from their homes and placed in state custody than are white girls.
- Prosecutors are 20% more likely to formally petition in cases involving Black girls than in cases involving white girls.
- Judges consistently hand down more severe dispositions to Black girls than to white girls, even after accounting for seriousness of the offense, prior record, and age.
The Georgetown Law report argues that “the perception of Black girls as less innocent and more adult-like may contribute to more punitive exercise of discretion by those in positions of authority, greater use of force, and harsher penalties.” This “adultification” of Black youth, and especially of Black girls, likely contributes to the disproportionate representation of Black girls who are incarcerated; according to Prison Policy Initiative, Black girls comprise 35% of the population of girls who are locked up, Latina girls account for 19%, and white girls account for 38% (October 2019).
While overall rates of juvenile incarceration have declined across demographic groups, the rates at which Black kids are being transferred to adult courts are among the highest in 30 years of data collection (National Association of Social Workers, 2018). Judicial discretion certainly plays a large role: Black youth make up 47.3% of youth transferred to adult court by juvenile court judges who believe they cannot benefit from the juvenile system, despite making up only 14% of the total youth population. Data from a 2016 study in Florida show even more stark racial disparities regarding youth in the adult criminal legal system (National Association of Social Workers, 2018):
- Black youth made up 67.7% of mandatory and discretionary direct file transfers in 2016, even though they are only 21% of the youth population.
- Black and Hispanic youth were significantly more likely than their white counterparts to be sentenced to serve time in an adult jail when transferred to adult court.
- Judges gave Black youth prison sentences that were, on average, 7.8% longer than the prison sentences they gave to white youth for the same type of offense.
The consequences of these practices, and these disparities, are severe—youth in the adult criminal legal system are more likely to commit suicide, have psychiatric symptoms, and to recidivate than are youth in juvenile facilities.
Reform efforts to address issues in the juvenile justice system should focus on reducing racial disparities at all levels, from interactions with police, to court systems and transfer mechanisms, to the facilities themselves. Extensive data, disaggregated by race and gender, is critical to understanding the scope and causes of racial disparities and to creating trajectories for change.
No Child is Born Bad, The Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, April 2021.
Sounding the Alarm: The Criminalization of Black Girls in Florida, Delores Barr Weaver Policy Center, March 2021.
Racial Disparities in Youth Incarceration Persist, The Sentencing Project, Feb. 2021.
Fail: School Policing in Massachusetts, Citizens for Juvenile Justice, 2020.
- Women’s Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2019, Prison Policy Initiative, Oct. 2019.
- 3 Ways the 1994 Crime Bill Continues to Hurt Communities of Color, American Progress, May 10, 2019.
- The Color of Youth Transferred to the Adult Criminal Justice System: Policy & Practice Recommendations, National Association of Social Workers, 2018.
- Native Disparities in Youth Incarceration, The Sentencing Project, Oct. 2017.
- Black Disparities in Youth Incarceration, The Sentencing Project, September 2017.
- Girlhood Interrupted: The Erasure of Black Girls’ Childhood, Center on Poverty and Inequality at Georgetown Law, June 2017.
- Is School Policing Racially Discriminatory?, The Century Foundation, June 2016.
- When ‘Deshawn’ and ‘Greg’ Act Out in Class, Guess Who Gets Branded A Troublemaker, Macrina Cooper-White, HuffPost, Apr. 21, 2015.
- Disproportionate Minority Contact in the Juvenile Justice System, The Sentencing Project, May 2014.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.