NACDL - South Carolina Public Defense

NACDL Exposes Problems in South Carolina's Summary Courts

Following disturbing reports of courts in which those accused of crimes were charged, prosecuted, and in some instances, incarcerated, without a lawyer, NACDL, in partnership with the ACLU and the ACLU of South Carolina sought to examine what was occurring first-hand. Over the course of 8 months organization representatives conducted observations in 27 summary courts throughout South Carolina. The observations were stunning. There were courts in which not a single lawyer laid eyes on a case. Arresting officers served as prosecutors,_{1} 1 For more on police acting as prosecutors, see The Appeal Podcast: When Police Officer Double as Prosecutors, Oct. 31, 2019. judges meted out legal decision despite not being lawyers, and defendants were left wholly alone, as they were never even advised they had a constitutional right to a lawyer. These observations were documented in the 2016 report, Summary Injustice: A Look at Constitutional Deficiencies in South Carolina’s Summary Courts.

The observations were so concerning, NACDL undertook an additional investigation. Law students and legal professionals were trained to systematically gather information about court proceedings. For 3 months they conducted research in 5 South Carolina counties_{2} 2 Counties Studied: Charleston, Richland, Spartanburg, Florence, Orangeburg. Each day, teams observed misdemeanor court hearings in various venues. In every court, they found egregious, repeated constitutional violations. The observations and data were compiled in the 2017 publication, Rush to Judgment: How South Carolina’s Summary Courts Fail to Protect Constitutional Rights.

The report findings included:

Less than 1 in 10 defendants were represented by counsel.
In more than 1 in 4 cases no lawyer participating anywhere in the proceedings.
19% of those convicted were sentenced to jail; 97.4% of them did not have a lawyer.

Read Summary Injustice Read Rush to Judgment

Ep.53 – South Carolina's Sixth Amendment-Free Zones

Ep.53 – South Carolina's Sixth Amendment-Free Zones -- Last year, NACDL released its first report on South Carolina's summary courts, Summary Injustice: A Look at Constitutional Deficiencies in South Carolina's Summary Courts. This first report was a joint project with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of South Carolina. Then, earlier this year, NACDL released its second report on South Carolina's summary courts, Rush to Judgment: How South Carolina's Summary Courts Fail to Protect Constitutional Rights. As demonstrated in the reports, these courts routinely fail to inform defendants of their right to counsel and refuse to provide counsel to the poor at all stages of the criminal process. South Carolina summary courts also regularly violate the Constitution by sentencing defendants to jail simply because they cannot afford to pay fines.

In this podcast, we hear from Diane DePietropaolo Price, who until recently served as NACDL's Public Defense Training Manager. Diane was the lead author of the 2016 Summary Injustice report. We also hear from Dr. Alisa Smith, the Chair of the Department of Legal Studies at the University of Central Florida. Dr. Smith was the lead researcher and co-author of Rush to Judgment. Learn more about NACDL. Ivan J. Dominguez, host; Alexandra Funk and Ian Nawalinski, production assistants. Music West Bank (Lezet) / CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 and Walkabout (Digital Primitives) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.

In the wake of NACDL's reports, South Carolina Chief Justice, Donald Beatty, recalled thousands of warrants issued against individuals with low-level offenses who were accused of missing court dates or not paying fees and fines imposed.

As well in 2017 the ACLU filed lawsuits in Beaufort, Bluffton and Lexington Counties.(NACDL News Release Oct. 20, 2017) Shortly thereafter the SC Supreme Court issued a memo to all magistrates requiring individuals be advised of their right to counsel if facing a potential term of incarceration. In March 2018 the US District Court denied Lexington County's Motion to Dismiss and the US Court of Appeals dismissed the county's appeal. A district court judge also denied the County's Motion to Dismiss in Beaufort County._{3} 3 Bairford v. City of Beaufort, 312 F.Supp 3d 503 (2018)

On October 9, 2019 the parties reached a settlement. The settlement agreement provides that both municipalities will change their practices to ensure meaningful representation for those appearing who are unable to afford counsel. Steps to be taken include contracting with the circuit's public defender office to provide counsel, providing written and oral advisement of the right to counsel to each person charged with an offense that carries the possiblity of a jail sentence, and an end to trials in absentia without counsel.