☰ In this section

The Champion

June 2017 , Page 57 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Capital Cases

By Madeline S. Cohen

Read more Capital Cases columns.

District Judge Calls Federal Death Penalty Arbitrary, but Says Only Supreme Court Can Rule It Unconstitutional

United States v. Fell
Case No. 5:01-cr-12-01
(D. Vt. Dec. 13, 2016)
Opinion and Order on Constitutionality of the Federal Death Penalty Act

The federal death penalty is arbitrary and biased, but only the Supreme Court can rule it unconstitutional. This was the conclusion of a federal district court judge in Vermont in December 2016.

After hearing two weeks of largely uncontroverted evidence in United States v. Fell, U.S. District Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford found: “The Federal Death Penalty Act operates in an arbitrary manner in which chance and bias play leading roles.” (p. 3) Although Judge Crawford stopped short of ruling the federal death penalty unconstitutional, believing himself bound by Supreme Court precedent to the contrary, he urged the Court to recognize that its decisions purporting to reform the death penalty “have largely failed to remedy t

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us