- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2016 Amendments (March 2016)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2015 Amendments (March 2015)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2014 Amendments (March 2014)
- Letter to the USSC on Priorities for the 2014 Amendment Cycle (July 2013)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2013 Amendments (March 2013)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2012 Amendments (March 2012)
- Statement to the USSC on Applying the Fair Sentencing Act Retroactively (June 2011)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2011 Amendments (March 2011)
- Statement to the USSC on Proposed Changes to the Sentencing Guidelines (March 2011)
- Comments to USSC on Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (October 2010)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2010 Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines (March 2010)
- Comments to USSC on Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy (November 2006)
- Comments on USSC Sentence Reduction Motions (July 2006)
- Coalition Comments to USSC on Proposed 2006 Amendments (March 2006)
- Testimony to USSC on Amending Commentary on Waiving Attorney-Client Privilege (March 2006)
- Coalition Comments to the USSC on Priorities for the 2006 Amendment Cycle (August 2005)
- Letter to the USSC on Proposed 2005 Amendments in Light of the Booker Decision (March 2005)
- Comments with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to USSC on CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (March 2004)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2004 Amendments (February 2004)
- Statement to USSC on Proposed Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines (March 2003)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 2003 Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines (March 2003)
- Statement to USSC on Proposed Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines (March 2002)
- Comments to USSC on Proposed 1997-1998 Amendments (April 1998)
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1997-1998 Amendments (April 1997)
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1997 Amendments (March 1997) - Part II
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1997 Amendments (March 1997) - Part I
- Letter on USSC Proposed 1997 Emergency Amendments (February 1997)
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1997 Emergency Amendments (February 1997)
- Comments on USSC Rules of Practice and Procedure (December 1996)
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1997 Amendments (December 1996)
- Comments to USSC on the Federal 100-to-1 Crack-Powder Cocaine Sentencing Disparity (April 1995)
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1994 Amendments (March 1994)
- Comments on USSC Proposed 1993 Amendments (March 1993)
Explore keywords to find information
This is a sponsored ad
MyCase
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Featured Products
-
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
-
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
-
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
-
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.