- Comments on Proposed Amendments to FRAP (February 2020)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to Federal Rules of Evidence (February 2018)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to Federal Rules of Criminal and Habeas Procedure (February 2018)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (February 2018)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to Disclosure Rule for the US District Court for D.C. (February 2018)
- Comments with NYCDL to Judge Molloy on Proposed Amendments to FRCrP Rule 16 (March 2016)
- Comments on Proposed Amendments to FRCrP Rule 12 (February 2012)
- Comments on Proposed Amendments to FRCrP Rule 11 (February 2012)
- Comments on Proposed Amendments to FRE (February 2012)
- Comments on Proposed Amendments to FRAP (February 2012)
- Judge Emmet Sullivan’s Letter to the Rules Committee Suggesting a FRCrP Rule Change (April 2009)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP and FRE (February 2009)
- Letter on the Proposal to Extend Statutory Deadlines (December 2008)
- Letter on Proposed Rules Related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (May 2007)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP (February 2007)
- Statement on Implementing the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Acquittal Judgments (January 2007)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP, FRAP (February 2006)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FISC Rules (November 2005)
- Letter to US Courts on Proposed Rules to the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (April 2003)
- Habeas Corpus Rules Amendments (March 2003)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Evidence (March 2003)
- Letter to US Courts on Proposed Rules to the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (August 2002)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP and FRE (February 2002)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (February 2001)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRAP Governing Habeas Corpus (February 2001)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP Applicable to Criminal Forfeiture (March 1999)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP Applicable to Criminal Forfeiture (February 1999)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP Applicable to Criminal Forfeiture (January 1999)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP Excluding Criminal Forfeiture (February 1998)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP Applicable to Criminal Forfeiture (February 1998)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to Federal Rules of Criminal and Appellate Procedure (February 1996)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to the FRCrP, FRE, and FRAP (February 1995)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal and Appellate Procedure (April 1994)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to FRCrP, FRE, and FRAP (April 1993)
- Comments on Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Evidence (August 1990)
Explore keywords to find information
This is a sponsored ad

MyCase
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Featured Products
-
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
-
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
-
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
-
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.