Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
A Call to End Prospective Waivers of Judicial Disqualification in Accountability Courts
By Christopher C. Edwards and Jacob B. Vail
A. The Proposed Comment
The ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (CJC), Rule 2.11: Disqualification, provides: “A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. …”1 A seventh comment should be added to that rule:
 A judge serving on therapeutic or problem-solving courts, mental health courts, or drug courts may assume a more interactive role with parties and others than in traditional courts, but impartiality of the judge is essential to the legitimacy of all courts. All judges are always subject to disqualification, unless disqualification is waived based upon known, existing facts.
The proposed comment would preclude accountability courts from requiring a prospective waiver of judicial disqualification as a condition to admission into accountability court. Included in this article are examples of the waiver forms that should be prohibited. The license to innovate in accountability
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.