Attorney-Conducted Voir Dire is Fairer, More Efficient
Washington, DC (December 14, 1995) -- Federal courts should be required to permit attorneys to participate in pretrial questioning of jurors in criminal trials, prominent Northern California attorney James Farragher Campbell will urge a federal judicial panel at a hearing in Oakland, California on Friday. Campbell will testify on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL).
"To render effective assistance of counsel, an attorney must have the opportunity to uncover bias among jurors," Campbell, a partner in the San Francisco law firm of Campbell & DeMetrick, is expected to tell the panel. "Attorneys for the parties in a case are in a much better position to accomplish this than the presiding judge, because they know more about the facts of the case and they have their clients' vital interests to protect," he added.
Campbell's comments will come at a hearing scheduled by a committee of federal judges who advise the Judicial Conference of the United States on proposed changes in the rules governing federal trials. The Judicial Conference is considering amending Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to require judges to allow attorneys for defendants and the government to play an active role in voir dire, the process of questioning jurors to discover prejudice before a trial begins. The current rule permits, but does not require, judges to do so.
The hearing, which will take place in the auditorium of the U.S. Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, in Oakland, California, will provide an opportunity for public comment on the proposed rule change. It begins at 8:30 a.m. on Friday and is expected to conclude around noon.
NACDL has long advocated attorney-conducted voir dire in federal criminal trials. Studies have shown that jurors are much more revealing of their true attitudes when they respond to open-ended questions posed by the lawyers in a case than when asked 'yes or no' questions by the judge. For that reason, as Campbell will remind the judges, "rather than prolonging trials, attorney questioning of potential jurors is the most efficient way to insulate juries from the constitutionally-forbidden influence of prejudice."
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.