Washington, DC (December 10, 1997) -- In a victory for justice and common sense, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled today that a prosecutor who lied in order to obtain an arrest warrant may be sued for damages. Kalina v. Fletcher, No. 96-792, affirms lower court decisions holding that state officials enjoy only limited immunity from suits for violations of civil rights they commit during the course of performing their official duties.
The plaintiff in the suit, Rodney Fletcher, was arrested for burglary and spent a day in jail after Washington state deputy prosecuting attorney Lynne Kalina knowingly made false statements when she swore out a warrant for his arrest. Charges against Mr. Fletcher were dismissed the next day, and he sued Ms. Kalina in federal court for false imprisonment and violating his civil rights under color of state law.
"Demanding immunity for prosecutorial misconduct such as lying under oath is unbelievable gall," observed New York attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt, president of the 9,500 member National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "Her claim that holding her responsible for her alleged deceit would somehow 'chill' prosecutors from effectively doing their job is absurd. In a system of checks and balances, courts have to be able to rely on the proposition that sworn statements supporting arrest or search warrants are truthful and made in good faith. Simply put, the prosecutor tried to claim immunity for allegedly made up evidence against Mr. Fletcher, and no person should be able to lie under oath without consequences."
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.