Albuquerque, NM (January 17, 2006) -- In the 1960's and the 1970's the FBI, CIA and the Chicago Police Department followed me, kept files on me, wrote about my anti-war and civil rights speeches, made copies of my writings, took my picture. I was not a lawyer then and although their activities were clear attempts to chill my First Amendment rights, they failed.
In the 1980's, after I became a lawyer, the Albuquerque Police Department began collecting files on activists and lawyers. We sued but the police destroyed the files before we saw them. Once again the police had tried to chill my First Amendment rights, but they could not.
This time the government has succeeded in chilling my First Amendment rights and jeopardizing my clients' First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. This time the government has gone far beyond listening to what I say in public, making endless copies of public speeches, taking photos. This time the government has invaded not only my privacy but the sacred bond I have with my clients to keep their confidences.
The oldest privilege within the common law tradition on which this country was founded is the attorney-client privilege. A client has every right to believe that what he or she tells a lawyer in confidence will be secure. But now there is every indication that the government has listened to conversations I have had with my clients both here and abroad. My practice requires that I speak with lawyers living abroad, with witnesses and experts around the world. I no longer use the telephone, fax or email to communicate with clients, lawyers, witnesses, experts in any of my cases that involve terrorist related charges. I must travel the world to represent my clients as they have the right to be represented–zealously within the bounds of the law and with their confidences and my work-product protected.
Congress passed the wiretap laws and the FISA to provide access to telephone, email, and faxes when necessary to protect the security of the country. If those laws are violated, we can ask a court to suppress the evidence. If we believe the laws are unconstitutional, we can ask a court to find them so. If the Executive chooses to take it upon itself to ignore the Constitution and the laws Congress has passed, we have no recourse and our democracy is in peril.
As a member and Past-President of NACDL, I am proud that NACDL has joined the ACLU in this important litigation.
[Nancy Hollander may be reached at (505) 842-9960.]
A copy of the lawsuit filed today may be found at: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23491lgl20060117.html
Continue reading below
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.