Washington, DC (June 17, 1999) --
The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that a Virginia prosecutor withheld evidence in its prosecution of Tommy Strickler for capital murder in 1990. Strickler v. Greene, No. 98-5864. The court agreed with Strickler that the evidence improperly suppressed “might have produced a different result, either at the guilt or sentencing phases.” But the majority, placing the burden on the death row inmate, upheld the death sentence, finding that Strickler failed to establish a “reasonable probability” of a different result. Justices Souter and Kennedy disagreed, and would have vacated the death sentence. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) filed a friend of the court brief supporting Strickler.
NACDL President Larry Pozner issued the following statement from his office in Denver today:
“The Court is overlooking blatant prosecutorial misconduct, while yet another inmate is sent to his death. A great many death cases are pursued by politically-ambitious prosecutors who will bend or break Constitutional rules to get the result they want. When they are caught red-handed, the only just remedy is a new trial — the fair trial that was denied the first time.
“The Supreme Court looked at the evidence — including information favorable to the accused that had been hidden by the prosecutor. And then seven Justices found the defendant guilty of murder and sentenced him to death. Weighing the evidence and deliberating on the outcome is what we have juries for. And a Virginia death sentence must be unanimous — not with two dissenters. In a separate presumably fair trial, Strickler’s co-defendant was spared the death sentence. Tommy Strickler deserves the same opportunity.”
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.