Washington, DC (June 1, 1999) --
Supreme Court Vacates Drug Conviction
The U.S. Supreme Court today held that before a jury can find that the government has proven the federal crime of “Continuing Criminal Enterprise,” it must agree that a “continuing series”of drug offenses was proven beyond a reasonable doubt — and must be unanimous as to what those offenses were. Richardson v.United States, 97-8629. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) filed a friend of the court brief on behalf of the right to jury unanimity.
NACDL President Larry Pozner issued the following statement from his office in Denver today:
“The inviolable right to a jury trial in criminal cases -- reaching back to the time when King John signed the Magna Carta in 1215 -- must not be diluted by the government simply throwing multiple charges against the wall of justice to see if any of them stick. Our cherished liberties cannot be protected from governmental overreaching unless juries are instructed that overcoming the presumption of innocence requires their unanimous agreement as to each and every element of the accusation.
“The government in this case, using one of the most deadly weapons in the ‘war on crime’ -- a charge calling for imprisonment for life without parole -- took one shortcut too many, the Supreme Court properly notes. Our fundamental liberties as Americans desperately need to be reasserted, and proclaimed throughout the land, as the Court has just done.”
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.