Public is denied basic information on use of PATRIOT Act
Washington, DC (May 18, 2005) – The Senate Intelligence Committee has announced that tomorrow’s scheduled mark-up of USA-PATRIOT Act amendments will be closed to the public and the media.
When the USA-PATRIOT Act was passed in October 2001, without hearings or debate, Congress assumed the risk that some provisions would put undue burdens on civil liberties and the privacy of the American people. That is why some of the more extreme provisions in the law are due to sunset by the end of this year if not re-enacted or modified to comport with the Constitution and society’s reasonable expectations of privacy and fairness.
“The PATRIOT Act gave federal authorities a number of emergency powers on a temporary basis, such as those used against Brandon Mayfield and his family,” said Barry Scheck, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. “What happened to Brandon Mayfield, a young lawyer in Oregon with a small civil practice, could happen to any of us. Somehow a latent print on a bag in Madrid got matched with one of his prints in his military records. When the FBI discovered he hadn’t even been out of the country in over a decade, instead of realizing that a mistake may have been made, they assumed that he must have used another identity. They secretly invaded his home, his law office and his computer, and tapped his telephones. They infiltrated his house of worship and followed him everywhere. They eventually arrested him as a material witness and detained him without charging him with a crime. The judge warned him he could face the death penalty. After several weeks, Spanish police convinced the FBI that they had the wrong guy. He wasn’t a terrorist. He was just an ordinary American who became the focus of a massive secret investigation because somebody made a mistake, and his life was turned upside down.”
Kyle O’Dowd, NACDL’s Legislative Director, explained, “Provisions of the PATRIOT Act omit essential checks and balances and are subject to abuse. Sometimes that means an innocent person’s privacy is violated; sometimes it means an innocent person’s reputation, livelihood and life are substantially damaged.”
Other powers due to expire this year include obtaining private records, such as library and medical records; membership lists of organizations, including churches; e-mail headers and Web browsing histories; “roving” wiretaps in foreign intelligence cases; and “data-mining” of public and private records without having to justify the collections with specific and articulable facts.
“The public has been denied basic information about the use of PATRIOT Act authorities,” Scheck said. “The Intelligence Committee should not be aiding and abetting this climate of secrecy by closing its door.”
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.