Washington, DC (May 13, 1996) -- "Eight members of the Court 'hear no evil, see no evil, and speak no evil' of the government," declared William B. Moffitt, Treasurer of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), today in response to the Supreme Court's anxiously-awaited ruling in Armstrong v. U.S. "They are deaf to the cries of African Americans for racial justice in the enforcement of our criminal laws," he said.
Moffitt, a prominent Alexandria, Virginia, criminal defense lawyer, criticized today's ruling as unrealistic.
"This majority would require indigent criminal defendants and their public defender attorneys to somehow undertake sophisticated statistical studies in order to raise a claim of selective prosecution," Moffitt said. "If they could do that, they wouldn't need the government to disclose the wealth of information it has in its possession."
"Sworn statements of people with first-hand knowledge that white defendants are getting easier treatment are brushed aside as insignificant," he noted.
"Anyone looking to the Supreme Court to inject logic into our system will be sorely disappointed," Moffitt commented. "As 'evidence' that crack crimes are mostly committed by African Americans, today's decision cited statistics showing 90% of those convicted are Black," he said. "Doesn't that sort of beg the question of whether Blacks are being selectively prosecuted?"
NACDL filed an amicus curiae brief in the Armstrong case and fights in courts and Congress for elimination of racially discriminatory sentences for crack cocaine offenses. Moffitt is the author of a major appellate brief challenging those sentences.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.