Richards v. Wisconsin Is Victory for Fourth Amendment
Washington, DC (April 28, 1997) -- The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that Americans shall be secure in their homes and persons from unreasonable searches and seizures. To that end, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers argued on behalf of Steiney Richards in the Supreme Court decision handed down today, Richards v. Wisconsin.
In refusing to uphold Wisconsin's 'blanket exception' in drug cases to the common law requirement that police officers knock and announce their presence before forcibly entering a dwelling, the Supreme Court boldly reaffirms Americans' right to the sanctity of the home. NACDL agrees with the Court that in most cases, the government's interests in breaking into a person's home or other abode without requesting entry do not outweigh the individual privacy interests intruded upon by a no-knock entry. We note also that the attorneys general of 26 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Territory of Guam filed a brief rejecting Wisconsin's rule permitting no-knock entry in any felony drug case.
NACDL agrees with the Court that it is "always dangerous to ground exceptions to constitutional protections in the social norms of a given historical moment." Indeed, the right to be secure in our homes from unreasonable government intrusion is one of our most ancient and cherished, and for which we tore ourselves from England over 200 years ago.
Although we are disappointed that the Petitioner, Mr. Richards, did not gain the relief he sought and deserved, today's decision is a victory for the Fourth Amendment. On behalf of the entire Association, I would like to congratulate the NACDL attorneys who worked on this case, Henry Schultz, David Karpe, and John Wesley Hall, Jr., who represented Mr. Richards, and Lisa Kemler, Tracy Maclin and Steven Shapiro, who submitted the amicus curiae brief on behalf of NACDL and the ACLU.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.