Washington, DC (March 16, 2010) – I have been following the McCarthy-style attack campaign being waged against the Justice Department lawyers who formerly provided legal assistance to Guantanamo detainees and military commission defendants. That is why I was so pleased to see lawyers from across the country and across the political spectrum defending the constitutional role of legal counsel in justice system. As President of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the world's largest criminal defense bar association, I want to thank all of them for standing up to persons who would tear our country apart and weaken the rule of law for the sake of scoring a few political points.
Some of the finest legal minds in the country – many of them brilliant young lawyers with tremendous earning potential in the private sector – have chosen instead to serve the public interest in the Department of Justice. These lawyers understand the constitutional right to a vigorous defense and the right not to be imprisoned without charges. They are assets to our country whether they are representing the Department of Justice or the detainees.
Vague allegations of “conflict of interest,” that somehow these lawyers could prejudice the interests of the United States, are fanciful and misplaced. Conflicts between prosecuting attorneys and the accused are governed by the general conflict of interest rules, which are based on simple fairness and basic common sense. The ethical rules routinely help lawyers and firms avoid potential conflicts. As Attorney General Eric Holder has noted, the rules generally do not prohibit lawyers who once represented plaintiffs in a cause from representing defendants in the same area of law, or vice versa. While care must be taken to ensure that the lawyers’ former clients are not adversely affected, the rules in no way diminish the Department appointees’ loyalty to DOJ and the Constitution.
What saddens me about this non-story is that some selfishly seek to tarnish public servants, military lawyers and private counsel with unfounded nonsense and innuendo in order to advance their political agendas.
Let me be perfectly clear: securing the rights of the accused redounds to the benefit of our country and preserves our stature as a defender of liberty in the eyes of the world. The military and civilian lawyers who zealously represent Guantanamo detainees are some of the finest counsel I have ever seen, and in the noble tradition of John Adams, they deserve our thanks.
Pre-Trial Suppression & Fourth Amendment Issues
This Trial Guide is a topical and practical handbook examining the nuts and bolts of the most current Fourth Amendment & Pre-Trial Suppression issues encountered in modern criminal cases.
Defense Counsel Playbook for Eyewitness ID Cases
This Trial Guide was written to help counsel use existing case law to its strongest advantage, and to create a framework for appellate challenges urging courts to adopt leading cases.
Ultimate Cross 2.0
This special CLE compilation program includes the highest-rated presentations on Cross-Examination techniques from NACDL's most recent seminars (2017-2019).
Forensic Sciences in Criminal Cases: A Multidiscipline Primer
In order to challenge forensic evidence, experts, reports and findings commonly encountered in the courtroom, an attorney must first have a basic understanding of the forensic issues that they will be confronting.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.