San Antonio, TX (January 20, 2010) – On September 25, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would hear a challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injection in Baze v. Rees, prompting death penalty lawyers all over the country to file for stays of execution pending the high court’s decision in that case. Advised by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals general counsel that the Texas Defender Service would be filing for a stay in the imminent execution of Michael Richard sometime after the court’s official closing time of 5:00 p.m., Chief Judge Sharon Keller ordered that the clerk’s office be closed at 5:00 and neglected to refer the case to any of the appeals judges in the courthouse, who could have issued an emergency stay. Mr. Richard was executed that evening. As a result, a number of persons and organizations, including the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, filed complaints against Judge Keller with the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which appointed a Special Master to investigate the matter and make findings of fact.
In light of the Special Master’s findings of fact released today, the President of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Cynthia Hujar Orr of San Antonio, released the following statement:
We [the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers] are encouraged that the special master found that the chief judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals acted in a less than “exemplary” fashion, “exhibited poor judgment” and is unrepentant for her conduct in the Michael Richard death penalty case.
The findings of fact underscore Judge Sharon Keller’s lack of awareness of her responsibility to ensure that the Texas court system is fair and just, and is perceived to be fair and just. The special master was incredulous of her statement under oath that if she could do it all over again she would not change any of her actions. Her words and actions suggest a lack of good judgment in general and grave disrespect for the gravity and finality of the death penalty in particular.
We do, however, expect that the Commission on Judicial Conduct will exercise its independent judgment and come to its own conclusion on the facts of the case. The fact that Judge Keller still cannot see her errors, seeming to suggest that the rest of the Texas legal community is out of step, not she, is the strongest indication that she needs correction from her peers, who along with the high court, have also suffered disrepute and public suspicion from this most unfortunate affair.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.