☰ In this section

The Champion

May 2003 , Page 55 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Searching government offices and computers

By Barry Tarlow

Read more RICO Report columns.


 Government agencies, like private employers, are entitled to ensure that employees comply with workplace rules. See Connick v. Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 143 (1983) (employee may be terminated for speech that did not touch on matter of public concern that could affect morale of workplace). Private employers are free to search employee work areas without probable cause to suspect wrongdoing, and certainly without first obtaining authorization from a judge. Yet government employers, as state actors, are limited by the Fourth Amendment in their ability to intrude into employees’ protected privacy interests.  

A fairly typical concern in the modern workplace is the misuse of computers by employees who surf the Internet for non-work-related purposes. See Urofsky v. Gilmore, 216 F.3d 401, 404 (4th Cir. 2000)(holding constitutional Virginia statute prohibiting state employees from viewing sexually explicit material on state-owned or leased computers). Sometimes an employee’s misuse o

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us