☰ In this section

The Champion

March 2018 , Page 32 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

New Technologies, New Defenses: Beating ShotSpotter in Firearms Trials

By Mia Eisner-Grynberg

New and improved law enforcement technologies, life in an ever-encroaching and expanding surveillance (and self-surveillance) state, and a regressive presidential administration1 combine to produce fear and anxiety in criminal defense attorneys fighting gun possession cases at trial. At their core, gun cases almost always come down to police credibility. With knowledge, creativity and confidence, defense attorneys can embrace these very same technological developments to attack officer testimony, build reasonable doubt, fight for their clients, and win.

The Changing Landscape of Gun Possession Cases

As few as 10 years ago, the standard gun trial consisted essentially of police officers testifying that they recovered a gun from on or near an attorney’s client, and an “expert” (or stipulation) concluding that the gun was operable and/or manufactured out of state. Today, even the most routine gun cases commonly involve fingerprint and DNA testing, evidence derived from clien

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us