☰ In this section

The Champion

June 2017 , Page 34 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Fighting Governmental Witness Tampering - (Or, You Can Have Our Defense Witnesses When You Pry Them From Our Cold, Dead Hands)

By Kevin Sali and John Robb

A layperson, asked how a trial in a serious criminal case typically unfolds, will likely give a quaintly naïve response. The prosecutor, the layperson might respond, puts on witnesses and other evidence tending to show that the defendant is guilty of the charged crime. The defense lawyer cross-examines the prosecution witnesses to reveal any reasons their testimony may be unreliable, and to draw out any additional evidence that may favor the defense. When the prosecution’s case is over, the defense presents any witnesses and evidence that may show that the defendant did not commit the crime (or that the government’s proof has weaknesses), and the prosecution gets its shot at undermining that evidence. Finally, the jury looks at all of the evidence submitted by both sides and decides whether guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

People who work within the criminal justice system know that this is not really the way it works. They know that this picture of a

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us