The Champion

April 2016 , Page 15 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

NACDL News: Flawed Microscopic Hair Comparison Analysis Testimony Leads to New Trial for George Perrot

By Ivan J. Dominguez and Ezra Dunkle-Polier

Read more NACDL News columns.

On Jan. 26, 2016, George D. Perrot was granted a new trial in Massachusetts based on newly discovered evidence that the FBI’s microscopic hair comparison testimony contained scientifically invalid statements. The court found that the hair examiner’s testimony was “enormously influential” and material to the convictions. This decision follows a trend in recognizing that evolving science constitutes newly discovered evidence.

“The court found that the scientific errors identified by the FBI review constituted newly discovered evidence, that the hair comparison testimony in Mr. Perrot’s case would be inadmissible if offered today, and also that it was material to his convictions,” said NACDL Senior Resource Counsel Vanessa Antoun. “This illustrates the importance of uncovering cases with invalid or exaggerated forensic evidence and providing meaningful notification — a duty to correct that the FBI and DOJ have acknowledged through this review, which sets an important

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
login

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us
ad