Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Prosecution With A Vengeance - Without an Unambiguous Statute in Sight
By Harvey A. Silverglate
Citizens from all walks of life — doctors, accountants, businessmen, political activists, and others — have found themselves the targets of federal prosecutions, despite sensibly believing that they did nothing wrong, broke no laws, and harmed not a single person. In these wheels of injustice, vague laws are the lynchpin, functioning in very much the opposite way than originally intended: they obscure, rather than clarify, the law’s demands.
Material Support to Terrorist Groups
The criminal ban against providing “material support” to organizations listed by the government as “terrorist” groups is an often-used tool in the post-9/11 “war on terror.”1 Fearful that even its peace-promoting activities might be deemed criminal, the Humanitarian Law Project, a human rights group, challenged the government’s extraordinarily broad and vague definition of the phrase “material support.”
After wending its way through lower courts for more than a decade — during which time the “material support” sta
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.