The Champion

August 2006 , Page 35 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

To DUI or Not to DUI, That Is The Question

By Stephen L. Jones

A new client enters your office. He tells you he has been charged with his first DUI. The client reveals to you that on the night in question he was out with friends, had six mixed drinks, fell asleep behind the wheel, and crashed into a tree. The police responded to the scene and found the client stumbling around the vehicle. They administered three field sobriety tests — the nystagmus eye test, the one-leg stand test, and the walk and turn test. The client could not perform any of the tests. After his arrest, the client was taken to the police station where he took a breath test with a reading of 0.13%. The police reports confirm that the client’s memory is accurate. The client asks your advice on what to do. If your answer is that the case is bad, the chance of winning remote and he should plead, you might be right — and you might be wrong.

In a time when the practice of law is becoming more and more specialized1, is it possible that a criminal practitioner should be hesitant to acc

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us