Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
By Jon May, Carol Cohen
One of the most difficult decisions a lawyer has to make during the
course of a trial is whether to put his client on the stand. Few choices
are fraught with such danger, particularly in a close case. Since a
defendant’s testimony may alone create a reasonable doubt or eliminate
all doubt whatsoever, the choice can be an agonizing one. The numerous
factors that counsel must take into consideration can be so subtle and
so interrelated that some lawyers simply despair at making any decision
at all; some adopting a policy of never putting their client on the
stand unless the client absolutely insists. Of the myriad of factors
that enter into the decision whether to have the defendant testify, the
possibility that the client will be impeached with his or her prior
convictions or bad acts is unique. This is because under the decision of
the Supreme Court in Luce v. United States1 it may be necessary
for counsel to put his client on the stand in order to have any
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.