United States v. Rishi Shah and Shradha Agarwal

Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Illinois Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellants

Brief filed: 04/11/2025

Documents

United States v. Rishi Shah and Shradha Agarwal

7th Circuit Court of Appeals; Case No. 24-2230 & 24-2236

Prior Decision

Decision below No. 1:19-cr-864 (N.D. Ill.)

Argument(s)

Amici argue that the government violated Defendants-Appellants’ Sixth Amendment rights by restraining millions in untainted assets needed to hire counsel of choice, constituting structural error requiring automatic reversal. The brief also challenges the government’s use of grand jury hearsay statements from key cooperating witnesses at trial, contending it undermined the confrontation right by allowing scripted testimony to override live witness examination. Finally, amici assert that the fraud convictions rested on legally defective theories inconsistent with recent Supreme Court precedent—namely, Ciminelli, Kelly, and McNally—because the government failed to show a specific intent to deprive victims of money or traditional property, instead criminalizing contractual disputes.

Author(s)

Jonathan M. Brayman (NACDL Seventh Circuit Amicus Vice Chair) and Todd S. Pugh, Breen & Pugh, Chicago, IL; Joshua G. Herman, Law Office of Joshua G. Herman, Chicago, IL. Brayman is NACDL Seventh Circuit Amicus Vice Chair

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products