NACDL - United States v. Manning

United States v. Manning

Brief of Amici Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and Center for Democracy & Technology in Support of Appellant.

Brief filed: 05/17/2016

Documents

United States v. Manning

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; Case No. ARMY 20130739

Argument

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act does not prohibit violations of computer use restrictions, such as the restriction at issue. The CFAA was meant to target "hacking," not violations of computer use restrictions. Written, policy-based restrictions on manner of access are restrictions on use. The lower court's broad reading of the CFAA renders the statute unconstitutionally vague. Corporate policies do not provide sufficient notice of what conduct is prohibited. Basing CFAA liability on violations of use restrictions would permit capricious enforcement by prosecutors. This Court should reverse Appellant's conviction under Specification 13 of Charge II.

Author(s)

Jamie Williams and Andrew Crocker, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA.