United States v. Ganias

Amicus Curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Defendant-Appellant and Urging Reversal.

United States v. Ganias

Case Details
Key Topics in the Case

Documents

Prior Decision

Panel decision at 755 F. 3d 125 (2nd Cir. 2014).

The prohibition on general warrants under the Fourth Amendment bars retention of non-responsive seized electronic materials. The Government’s seizure and indefinite retention of Mr. Ganias’s files transformed a limited warrant into a forbidden general warrant and thereby violated the Fourth Amendment. Permitting the Government to rifle through and retain confidential non-responsive electronic documents amounts to the modern equivalent of allowing “officers to rummage through homes” – the precise practice that was so abhorrent to the Founding Fathers.

Featured Products

Author(s)

Richard D. Willstatter, Green & Willstatter, White Plains, NY; Maranda E. Fritz and Eli B. Richlin, Thompson Hine LLP, New York, NY; Joel B. Rudin, Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, New York, NY.

Explore keywords to find information