United States v. Blundo

Defendant is charged with wire fraud and money laundering related to alleged false applications for PPP loans. Defendant alleges that the prosecution is vindictive and selective because it was orchestrated by his political rival who became he US Attorney (Sigal Chattah). He also seeks dismissal on the grounds of "outrageous government conduct," i.e. the US Attorney's refusal to recuse herself from the case despite explicit direction from DOJ to do so.

United States v. Blundo

Case Details
Key Topics in the Case

Case Analysis

Login is required to view the "Case Analysis" section of the Case Tracker. This content is limited to defense practitioners. Please log in or create a free NACDL account to continue. Non-NACDL members will be prompted to complete a brief attorney attestation form before access is granted.

Login

Case Files

 

Continue reading below

Suggest a Case

Know of a federal case that departs from traditional enforcement norms? Let us know.

Suggest a Case

Resources

Government Statement

News of Interest

Case Tracker Feedback

Help us improve the Unusual Case Tracker by sharing your experience and suggestions.

Take Brief Survey

Supported by NFCJ

The NACDL Foundation for Criminal Justice preserves and promotes the core values of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the American criminal justice system.

Support Us Now

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products