State of Minnesota v. Contreras-Sanchez

Brief Amici Curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Appellant

Brief filed: 07/19/2024

Documents

State of Minnesota v. Contreras-Sanchez

Minnesota Supreme Court; Case No. A22-1579

Argument(s)

In this case, the Court is presented with a novel investigative technique—a “geofence” or “reverse location” warrant—that provides police with unbridled discretion to track the travels of countless Minnesotans, regardless of whether they are connected to any crime. The specific warrant at issue here is a particularly pernicious example of a geofence warrant because it allowed the Dakota County Sheriff Office (DCSO) to seek location information for anyone who traveled within the geofenced area during a full month—significantly longer than any other geofence warrant that has been upheld by any court in the country. Further, the warrant, on its face, allowed police to—at their own discretion and without judicial oversight—seek the identities of any of these individuals, as well as six months of their IP histories, in turn revealing additional location information. Even if the warrant here were not a general warrant, it granted improper police discretion, lacked particularity, and was unconstitutionally overbroad. As such, amici urge this Court to find this warrant unconstitutional, overturn the trial court ruling, and suppress all evidence derived from the warrant.

Author(s)

Andrew Crocker and Jennifer Lynch, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA; Leita Walker, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Minneapolis, MN; Justin Johnston, Johnston Law Firm LLC, Kansas City, MO; Shauna Faye Kieffer, Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Minneapolis, MN; Michael Price and Nicola Morrow, NACDL, Washington, DC

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/StayInformed/Champion/ChampionCovers/March-April-2025.jpg?ext=.jpg

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/amicus.png

    Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/newsrelease.png

    News Release ~ Law Enforcement Executive Order

    NACDL Warns Executive Order's Dangerous Overreach Undermines Community Safety and Trust in Police – Washington, DC (April 29, 2025) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) expressed deep concern regarding the Executive Order titled "Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens," cautioning that several of its proposals represent a dangerous overreach that undermines these goals by jeopardizing individual rights and the legitimacy of law enforcement in the eyes of the community.

  4. Event
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Learn/nacdlcleinstitute/2025_Post-Dobbs_Trial_Tactics_2025-02-26_v02_Event-Listing_2.jpg?ext=.jpg

    Trial Tactics for Pregnancy-Related Cases: Skills for Every Defender

    LOCATION: The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, TX
    DATE: May 16-17, 2025
    COST: FREE (registration is required)
    CLE Credit: Up to 14.5 credits 

  5. Webinar
    /assets/img/nacdl_og.png

    Collaborative Approaches to Appellate Defense: Recognizing Clients' Legal Expertise

    WHEN: Thursday, May 8, 3:00-4:30pm ET / 12:00-1:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products