Roper v. Weaver

NACDL amicus brief in support of respondent.

Brief filed: 12/07/2007

Documents

Roper v. Weaver

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 06-313

Prior Decision

Decision below, 438 F.3d 832, cert. granted 12/7/07, argument scheduled 3/21/07.

Question Presented

Since the U.S. Supreme Court has neither held a prosecutor’s penalty phase closing argument to violate due process, nor articulated, in response to a penalty phase claim, what the standard of error and prejudice would be, does a court of appeals exceed its authority under AEDPA (28 U.S.C. §2254(d)(l)) by overturning a capital sentence on the ground that the prosecutor’s penalty phase closing argument was “unfairly inflammatory?” 

Argument(s)

Brief argues that case can be affirmed alternatively on Eighth Amendment grounds, and AEDPA's standard of review does not apply.

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

Michael Small and Gia Kim, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC.