Nijhawan v. Holder

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of petitioner.

Nijhawan v. Holder

Case Details
Key Topics in the Case

Documents

Prior Decision

Decision below 523 F.3d 387 (3d Cir. 2008).

Whether to avoid raising constitutional doubt or to provide fair warning under the rule of lenity, 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43)(M)(i) (defining an offense that involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim(s) exceeds $10,000) is a “dual use” statute requiring consistent interpretation in both criminal and immigration law contexts.

Featured Products

Author(s)

Iris E. Bennett, Anjan Choudhury and Michael A. Hoffman, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C. and David A. Newman, Jenner & Block, New York, NY.

Explore keywords to find information