Brief filed: 05/09/2016
Hebert v. United States
United States Supreme Court; Case No. 15-1190
Case below 813 F.3d 551 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2015).
In 2007, the Supreme Court in Rita v. United States declined to consider the hypothetical issue of whether judicial factfinding may justify an otherwise unreasonable sentence. This case presents the best possible concrete version of Rita's hypothetical. The Court should grant review to determine whether it was permissible for the district court to impose a 92-year sentence for a non-violent fraud with a Guidelines range of under five years, based solely on a judicial finding that petitioner committed a "heinous" murder. And for the reasons further detailed in the petition, the Court should also conclude that this sentence violated petitioner's right to a jury trial under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. The Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in this case.
This is a sponsored ad
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Clifford M. Sloan, David W. Foster, Geoffrey M. Wyatt, and John J. Schoettle, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC; Jonathan Hacker, Washington, DC.