Coca v. Nevada

Brief of National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers and Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice in Support of Appellant

Brief filed: 03/23/2023

Documents

Coca v. Nevada

Supreme Court of the State of Nevada; Case No. 85519

Argument(s)

The Supreme Court’s decision in Shinn fundamentally changed the landscape in which this Court decided Brown. Should Brown remain Nevada law, it will grossly undermine defendants’ right to competent counsel by devastating their ability to seek review of IATC claims. This Court should overrule Brown and redefine cause to overcome state procedural bars in state habeas proceedings. Brown’s consequences are now intolerable from the standpoint of history, equity, precedent, and due process.Amici respectfully ask this Court to reexamine and abrogate Brown and its definition of cause in light of Shinn. Amici ask this Court to expand the definition of cause excusing Nevada’s procedural bars to include the ineffective assistance of initial post-conviction counsel. This narrow shift in the Court’s explanation of cause is well within this Court’s authority. See Martinez, 566 U.S. at 13 (recognizing that the definition of cause is within the judiciary’s discretion to alter); see also Brown, 130 Nev. at 569, 331 P.3d at 870 (recognizing that this Court defines cause for the purposes of state habeas proceedings). Such a shift will ensure that criminal defendants have access to a meaningful process for litigating IATC claims, satisfying this Court’s implicit dictate in Mack v. Williams, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 86, 522 P.3d 434, 450 (2022), that every constitutional right requires a remedy.

Author(s)

Lauren D. Wigginton, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP + NACJ, Las Vegas, NV; Robin Wechkin, Sidley Austin LLP + NACDL, Washington, DC

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/StayInformed/Champion/ChampionCovers/March-April-2025.jpg?ext=.jpg

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/amicus.png

    Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/newsrelease.png

    News Release ~ Law Enforcement Executive Order

    NACDL Warns Executive Order's Dangerous Overreach Undermines Community Safety and Trust in Police – Washington, DC (April 29, 2025) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) expressed deep concern regarding the Executive Order titled "Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens," cautioning that several of its proposals represent a dangerous overreach that undermines these goals by jeopardizing individual rights and the legitimacy of law enforcement in the eyes of the community.

  4. Event
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Learn/nacdlcleinstitute/2025_Post-Dobbs_Trial_Tactics_2025-02-26_v02_Event-Listing_2.jpg?ext=.jpg

    Trial Tactics for Pregnancy-Related Cases: Skills for Every Defender

    LOCATION: The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, TX
    DATE: May 16-17, 2025
    COST: FREE (registration is required)
    CLE Credit: Up to 14.5 credits 

  5. Webinar
    /assets/img/nacdl_og.png

    Collaborative Approaches to Appellate Defense: Recognizing Clients' Legal Expertise

    WHEN: Thursday, May 8, 3:00-4:30pm ET / 12:00-1:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products