Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners

Brief filed: 02/07/2024

Documents

Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 557447

Argument(s)

When determining the elements for a Fourth Amendment claim under Section 1983, there are two steps. First, a court must “look to the elements of the most analogous tort as of 1871 when § 1983 was enacted.” Thompson v. Clark, 596 U.S. 36, 43 (2022). Second, courts apply that common-law rule so long as doing so is consistent with the “values and purposes” of the Fourth Amendment. This brief addresses the second step. The “any-crime” rule endorsed by the Sixth Circuit is an artificial, categorical rule of immunity that conflicts with several aspects of the Fourth Amendment. The common-law “charge-specific” rule is the more accurate embodiment of Fourth Amendment principles and should control under Section 1983.

Author(s)

Jeffrey T. Green, Co-Chair, NACDL Amicus Committee, Washington, DC;  Zachary D. Tripp, Joshua M. Wesneski, and Sebastian Laguna, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products