Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners

Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

Documents

When determining the elements for a Fourth Amendment claim under Section 1983, there are two steps. First, a court must “look to the elements of the most analogous tort as of 1871 when § 1983 was enacted.” Thompson v. Clark, 596 U.S. 36, 43 (2022). Second, courts apply that common-law rule so long as doing so is consistent with the “values and purposes” of the Fourth Amendment. This brief addresses the second step. The “any-crime” rule endorsed by the Sixth Circuit is an artificial, categorical rule of immunity that conflicts with several aspects of the Fourth Amendment. The common-law “charge-specific” rule is the more accurate embodiment of Fourth Amendment principles and should control under Section 1983.

Author(s)

Jeffrey T. Green, Co-Chair, NACDL Amicus Committee, Washington, DC;  Zachary D. Tripp, Joshua M. Wesneski, and Sebastian Laguna, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products