Brief filed: 05/11/2016
Bell v. United States
United States Supreme Court; Case No. 15-8606
Decision below United States v. Bell, 795 F.3d 88 (D.C.Cir. July 28, 2015).
This case presents an ideal vehicle for the Court to address under the Sixth Amendment the use of acquitted conduct from the same trial to increase a defendant's sentencing guidelines range. In order to preserve the essential role of the jury, a defendant's sentencing guidelines calculation should not include conduct of which he was acquitted at the same trial. Increasing a defendant's sentencing guidelines range by use of acquitted conduct violates the Sixth Amendment. Circuit precedent extending Watts to allow the use of conduct of which the defendant was acquitted at the same trial to calculate a defendant's range should be abrogated.
This is a sponsored ad
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Timothy Shannon and John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, Verrill Dana, LLP, Portland, ME; Jonathan D. Hacker, Washington, DC.