Barbour v. Louisiana

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Brief filed: 12/23/2010

Documents

Barbour v. Louisiana

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 10-689

Prior Decision

Decision below 35 So.3d 1142 (La.App. 2010).

Argument(s)

Non-unanimous verdicts significantly undermine the administration of criminal justice. Rules permitting non-unanimous verdicts have increased the risk of error and unfairness. Because cases presenting these concerns are numerous and recurring, the constitutionality of divided criminal verdicts and the correctness of the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not entitle criminal defendants to a unanimous jury verdict in state court, warrant the Court’s reconsideration. 

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

Jonathan L. Marcus, Elizabeth-Ann D. Katz, and Matthew S. Krauss, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC.