Brief filed: 12/23/2010
Barbour v. Louisiana
United States Supreme Court; Case No. 10-689
Decision below 35 So.3d 1142 (La.App. 2010).
Non-unanimous verdicts significantly undermine the administration of criminal justice. Rules permitting non-unanimous verdicts have increased the risk of error and unfairness. Because cases presenting these concerns are numerous and recurring, the constitutionality of divided criminal verdicts and the correctness of the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not entitle criminal defendants to a unanimous jury verdict in state court, warrant the Court’s reconsideration.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Jonathan L. Marcus, Elizabeth-Ann D. Katz, and Matthew S. Krauss, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC.