Exclusive Content
Access to the page you selected is exclusive.
If you are a member or have acccess, Login.
If you are not a member yet, please join NACDL and the fight for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system now.
Holds that the non-retroactive FSA change to § 924(c) cannot constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason for a sentencing reduction. While the stacked 924c can be part of the 3553a calculus, it does not create ECR (not even in combination with other factors). Another upsetting development in the circuit split landscape here.
Access to the page you selected is exclusive.
If you are a member or have acccess, Login.
If you are not a member yet, please join NACDL and the fight for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system now.