On March 26, 2021, NYSACDL and NACDL released this critically important report on the trial penalty in the New York State criminal legal system. This is the first-ever report on the decades-long impact of the trial penalty in New York State. It includes statistical analysis of the prevalence of the trial penalty, personal stories demonstrating how the issue impacts all New Yorkers by effectively removing a critical check on the state’s justice system, and principles and recommendations for how policymakers and prosecutors can reverse this trend and protect New Yorkers’ constitutional rights.
Over the past three decades, the proportion of criminal cases that progress to trial in New York state has steadily declined. As of 2019, 96% of felony convictions and 99% of misdemeanor convictions in New York State were the result of guilty pleas — a troubling phenomenon that severely weakens the integrity of the justice system by circumventing juries. One of the most significant contributing factors behind this trend is the trial penalty, or the empirically greater sentence a criminal defendant receives after trial compared to what prosecutors offer in a pretrial guilty plea. The coercive impact of the trial penalty induces individuals to surrender a panoply of valuable rights under pain of far greater punishment, and it has been shown to induce innocent accused persons to plead guilty.
To better understand the scope of the trial penalty and its impact in New York, NYSACDL and NACDL conducted a survey of criminal justice practitioners across the state. More than three hundred criminal defense attorneys responded and shared how they and their clients experienced the trial penalty firsthand. NYSACDL and NACDL also conducted a statistical analysis of criminal case dispositions, including a sample of 79 cases from Manhattan criminal defense organizations with plea and conviction data to investigate the prevalence and impact of the trial penalty in the borough.
- New Study Criticizes Courts For "Penalizing" Those Who Refuse To Plead Guilty, by George Joseph, WNYC, March 25, 2021
- Defendants Who Refuse Plea Deals Often Get Tougher Sentences. Will The Next Manhattan DA End That?, by George Joseph, Gothamist, March 26, 2021
- Plea Bargaining ‘Weakens Integrity’ of Judicial Process: Report, by TCR Staff, The Crime Report, March 26, 2021
- "The New York State Trial Penalty: The Constitutional Right to Trial Under Attack," Sentencing Law & Policy Blog, March 26, 2021
- New York Playbook PM, by Anna Gronewold and DAvid Giambusso, New York Politico Playbook, March 26, 2021
- City & State First Read Tonight, by Annie McDonough, City & State, March 26, 2021
- 'Coercive' Prosecution Drives Trial Penalty, Defense Attys Say, by Marco Poggio, Law360, March 30, 2021
- The Marshall Project Opening Statement, by Andrew Cohen, March 31, 2021
- Scathing Report Faults Rockland DA In 2012 Gas Explosion Case, by Lanning Taliaferro, Patch, April 1, 2021
- Study Finds Right to Trial Under Attack; Defense Lawyers Seek Way to End ‘Trial Penalty’ in NY State, by Ned Meiners, Davis Vanguard, April 3, 2021
- Opinion: How the trial penalty drives injustice, by Susan J. Walsh and Norman L. Reimer, New York Daily News, April 6, 2021
- When Going To Trial Isn’t Worth It, by Toni Messina, Above the Law, April 15, 2021
- Memo to Joe Biden: Add a Civilian Justice Corps to Your ‘New Deal’, by James Doyle, The Crime Report, April 16, 2021
- Lawmakers have a chance to eradicate the trial penalty, by Susan J. Walsh and Norman L. Reimer, Albany Times Union, May 31, 2021
- Candidates for Manhattan District Attorney on Ending the 'Trial Penalty', by Anna Kaufman, Gotham Gazette, June 16, 2021
Supported by NFCJ
The NACDL Foundation for Criminal Justice preserves and promotes the core values of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the American criminal justice system.Support Us Now
Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy Guide
NACDL’s Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence will assist criminal defense practitioners in scoring points when cross-examining forensic experts in cases involving DNA and biological evidence. This resource contains thousands of questions that will help defense lawyers cross-examine challenging witnesses without reinventing the wheel with each new case. It includes pattern questions that can be used to dominate prosecution DNA experts and level the playing field at trial.
Cross-Examination of the Analyst in Drug Prosecutions (2nd Ed.) By James M. Shellow
Now in its second edition with some new material, James M. Shellow’s book offers what its title promises: ways of thinking about cross-examining the forensic analysts in drug cases. But the book is so much more than that. It offers a look inside the mind of one of the finest cross-examiners and defense lawyers the United States has produced in the last seventy years. This small book can inspire and direct you in making big changes in the way you defend your clients and think about the entire project of trying any case.
Justice For All, Justice Now White T-Shirt (Women’s)
This custom, vintage-faded NACDL t-shirt is 50% polyester, 25% cotton, and 25% rayon weighing 5.2 oz. and is lightwieght, flexible and soft, providing maximum comfort. It features the "Justice For All, Justice Now" slogan and Lady Liberty image on the front, with the NACDL logo on the back. Currently available in both men's and women's sizes in both black and white colors. View the full line-up of colors and sizes on our online store, as well as our other popular and best-selling t-shirt designs at: nacdl.org/store.
Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection - CD-ROM
NACDL’s Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection is the sweeping culmination of every single article of written materials ever published from each installment of NACDL's annual "Defending Modern Drug Cases" seminar. Totaling over 12,000 pages, this vast collection includes 12+ years of motions, briefs, reports, outlines, transcripts, case citations, scholarly articles, powerpoints and other written commentaries. This collection provides trial strategies and tactics you can immediately apply to your current cases.
Mental Illness & the Law: Addressing and Litigating Behavioral Health Disorders in Criminal Cases
Whether it is insanity, impairment, a disorder, or adolescent brain development; mental health and intellectual competence issues affect pretrial supervision, trial and sentencing, and your chances of successfully advocating for your impaired client. This training provides ideas and proven solutions to assist you in advocating for your client during trial, whether it be insanity defenses, jury selection, cross of expert witnesses, persuasion, or mitigation at sentencing.