Government's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Suppression of Evidence Obtained Pursuant to Google Geofence Warrant
Defendant's Reply to Government's Response to Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Search of Information Associated with Mr. Chatrie's Google Accounts
Defendant's Reply to Government's Response to his Motion for Discovery Regarding Government's Use of Google's Sensorvault Data
Amicus Brief by Google, LLC In Support of Neither Party Concerning Defendant's Motion To Suppress Evidence From A "Geofence" General Warrant
Defendant's Motion for Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum Pursuant to Rule 17(c) and Memorandum in Support Thereof
Defense challenges use of Google location data from everyone in vicinity of Hull Street Road bank robbery.
(Richmond Times-Dispatch) Chatrie’s lawyers with the federal public defender office and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers argue in their suppression motion that Lauck 'should treat the geofence warrant here as any other general warrant: repugnant to the Constitution. Geofence warrants represent an unprecedented expansion of the government’s surveillance capabilities.'
(The Washington Post) Prosecutors called the case the first of its kind, though the issue has come up in other states, including New York, North Carolina, Florida and Minnesota. Experts expect that geofence warrants will be the next big Fourth Amendment battle in digital privacy.
(NBC News) As more police use such warrants, the method is raising concerns among privacy advocates, who say the government is gathering information from people in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches.
(International Business Times) Though geofencing warrants proved to be a powerful weapon for investigators, the practice has been criticised for its diluting effect on the Fourth Amendment right. That exactly is Chatrie’s defense.
An accused bank robber claims the police broke the law when they used Google location data to track him down. Privacy advocates agree.
(Insider) In theory, the geofence warrant attempts to take the idea of a physical crime scene and reimagine it for an internet-connected world. But that can lead to situations where innocent bystanders may have their personal information sucked up by police in wholesale ways that wouldn't have happened before the ubiquity of internet-connected smartphones.
This is a sponsored ad
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place