United States v. Chatrie

In United States v. Chatrie, Okello Chatrie was charged with armed robbery based on Google Sensorvault data obtained by law enforcement via a geofence warrant. This case was appealed to the Fourth Circuit, granted en banc review, and is now before the Supreme Court. The Fourth Amedment Center has been representing Mr. Chatrie since the district court. 

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to decide the constitutionality of so-called "geofence warrants", which require Google to search hundreds of millions of users to identify devices near the scene of the crime. The Court granted certiorari in Chatrie v. United States, No. 25-112, 2026 WL 120676, (U.S. Jan. 16, 2025), the first constitutional challenge to a geofence warrant in the country, litigated by NACDL's Fourth Amendement Center since 2019. A Virginia district court initially found the warrant unconstitutional but found that law enforcement had relied on the warrant in good faith and declined to suppress the evidence. United States v. Chatrie, 590 F. Supp. 3d 901 (E.D. Va. 2022). The Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed the district court's decision in a single-sentence per curium opinon, followed by nine concurrences and dissents, totallying 126 pages. United States v. Chatrie, 2025 WL 1242063 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2025). 

The Fourth Amendment Center is arguing that geofence warrants are unconstitutional general warrants issues without identifying a particular suspect, searching the data of millions of peopel without casue and with too much police discretion. 

Supreme Court of the United States

4th Circuit Court of Appeals 

4th Circuit Panel
4th Circuit En Banc

Eastern District of Virginia 

Featured Products

Explore keywords to find information