Upon our initial review of the bill, prior to its passage, we identified over two dozen new and troubling federal criminal offenses that would further explode the federal criminal code. This bill was never referred to either chamber’s Judiciary Committee before its enactment and, thus, none of these criminal offenses were considered by a full Judiciary Committee. Further, this bill will allow un-elected officials to enact new, broad regulations for the financial sector, many of which will be directly tied to criminal enforcement provisions and thus will be criminally punishable. In addition, and perhaps most troubling, the overwhelming majority of the criminal offenses contained in the bill lack adequate mens rea, or criminal intent, requirements and, consequently, will fail to protect innocent or inadvertent actors from being criminally prosecuted or punished.
The below document, titled "NACDL on H.R. 4173 - Recommendations," was issued prior to the Act's enactment. The recommendations sought to improve the quality of some of the criminal offenses included in bill and to make the overall bill more consistent with the fundamental principles of the American criminal justice system. Because some provisions were beyond salvage, the recommendation was to strike them in full. In many instances, however, the particular provision could have been improved by adding more protective mens rea requirements, limiting the scope of conduct covered by the offense, or both. Finally, where an offense allowed for the unlimited creation of additional offenses through the authorization of regulatory criminalization, the recommendation was to limit the punishment for violations to a civil penalty.
Pictured: NACDL Member Andrew Wise exploring the overcriminalization problems with the Dodd-Frank Act on March 24, 2011, at a Capitol Hill education event.
Resources on H.R. 4173
A Windfall for Overcriminalization, A Case for Reform (one pager on Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act [HR 4173.EAS])
NACDL on H.R. 4173 - Recommendations (recommendations for reforming Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act [HR 4173.ENR])
Criminal Provisions in H.R. 4173 (list of the criminal provisions in Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act [HR 4173.ENR])
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act, HR 4173.ENR (Enrolled Bill, HR 4173.ENR, Final as Passed Both House and Senate)
Continue reading below
HR 4173.EAS (Version of bill that served as the base-text for the Conference Committee)
Tiffany M. Joslyn, Criminal Provisions in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act, Federalist Society New Federal Initiatives Project (December 2010) [PDF Version]
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys