Kathleen Ridolfi, Tiffany M. Joslyn, & Todd H. Fries, Material Indifference: How Courts Are Impeding Fair Disclosure in Criminal Cases , NACDL and the VERITAS Initiative (2014)
Brady Issue , The Champion Magazine (May 2013)
National Institute of Justice, Predicting and Preventing Wrongful Convictions (2013)
Bennett L. Gershman, Subverting Brady v. Maryland and Denying a Fair Trial: Studying the Schuelke Report , 64 Mercer L. Rev. 683 (2013)
Peter A. Joy & Kevin C. McMunigal, Supervisors, Subordinates, and Sanctions , 28-FALL Crim. Just. 64 (2013)
Janet Moore, Democracy and Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick and Garcetti , 77 Brook. L. Rev. 1329 (2012)
Joel B. Rudin, Taking Prosecutorial Misconduct 'Unseriously': Brady Violations and The Myth of Professional Accountability , The Champion (December 2012)
Ellen Yaroshefsky, New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure In Practice After Connick v. Thompson , 25 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 913 (2012)
Federal Judicial Center, A Summary of Responses to the National Survey of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Disclosure Practices in Criminal Cases (2011)
David Keenan, Deborah Jane Cooper, David Lebowitz, & Tamar Lerer, The Myth of Prosecutorial Accountability After Connock v. Thompson: Why Existing Professional Responsibility Measures Cannot Protect Against Prosecutorial Misconduct , 121 Yale L.J. Online 203 (2011)
George A. Weiss, Prosecutorial Accountability After Connick v. Thompson , 60 Drake L. Rev. 199 (2011)
"Prosecutors Seldom Punished for Misconduct ," by John R. Emshwiller and Evan Perez, The Wall Street Journal (October 4, 2010)
Continue reading below
Featured Products
Challenging Carceral Forensic Software
This program arms defense attorneys with the legal strategies and technical understanding needed to challenge software evidence at every stage: expert qualifications, reliability under Rule 702, confrontation rights, discovery, due process, and more. You'll learn how to cross-examine government witnesses who rely on black-box technology they don’t truly understand—and how to force the court to take a closer look at what's really driving forensic conclusions. Learn how STRmix, TruleIO, ShotSpotter, and AI-generated sketches are marketed as scientifically validated, yet often evade scrutiny.
Pattern Cross-Examination for Digital Forensic Experts
This guide provides ready-to-use cross-examination questions, categorized by artifact type and case theme—from cell phone towers to deleted texts to smart devices and cloud forensics. Whether you’re handling a case involving child exploitation, stalking, or online fraud, this book delivers practical patterns designed to highlight sloppy forensics, bias, tool limitations, and assumptions of intent or identity. Defense attorneys don’t need a computer science degree—they need strategy, control, and the right questions to challenge the illusion of digital certainty in court.
Using Chat GPT in Criminal Cases - Writing Better Prompts
Want a motion written in plain language but grounded in Tennessee case law? Need a summary of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence with primary and secondary citations? This is where you learn how to get that—on demand, and with far less editing. This training is designed specifically for attorneys—busy professionals who need fast, accurate, and case-relevant AI support. Whether you’re drafting motions, brainstorming legal strategy, summarizing complex case law, or preparing cross-examinations, the quality of your AI output comes down to one thing: how you ask for it.
Alcohol, Blackouts and Consent in Sex Cases
This comprehensive training program provides defense attorneys with a rigorous, science-backed approach to dismantling prosecutorial narratives, exposing unreliable testimony, and ensuring that juries are properly educated on the complexities of memory, intoxication, and consent. You'll explores critical mistakes and misconceptions encountered in these cases, including errors in memory reconstruction after an event, incorrect inferences, cognitive schemas, suggestibility, contamination and misinformation, mistakes of fact and more.
Overcoming the Presumption of Guilt and Defining Reasonable Doubt
Reasonable Doubt, what is it?
In order to win criminal cases, the defense practitioner must object to a reasonable doubt standard that lowers the burden of guilt. This program will discuss proven methods to argue and define reasonable doubt persuasively to a jury. You’ll learn how define reasonable doubt using metaphors and hypothetical scenarios that force juries to dispute the evidence, conflicts in the evidence, or even lack of evidence in your case.
The DIY of DNA: Exoneration Through DNA Evidence
This presentation might be the first time you’re truly able to truly grasp the fundamentals of DNA evidence. This critical presentation blends real-world storytelling with clear, practical instruction—making DNA evidence finally feel accessible, even to non-scientists—while inspiring attorneys to dig deeper, ask smarter questions, and approach forensic science with newfound confidence. You’ll learn how to identify and interpret electropherograms, understand autosomal vs. Y-STR testing, and recognize the limits of DNA evidence—particularly when it involves partial or mixed samples.
Daniel S. Medwed, Brady’s Bunch of Flaws , 67 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1533 (2010).
Cardozo Law Review Symposium, New Perspectives on Brady and Other Disclosure Obligations: What Really Works? , 31 Cardozo L. Rev. 1943-2256 (June 2010).
Judith B. Wish, The United States Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility
Kathleen M. Ridolfi & Maurice Possley, Preventable Error: A Report on Prosecutorial Misconduct 1997-2009, Northern California Innocence Project , Santa Clara University School of Law (2010)
Malia Brink, A Pendulum Swung Too Far: Why the Supreme Court Must Place Limits on Prosecutorial Immunity , 4 Charleston L. Rev. 1 (2009)
Bruce A. Green, Regulating Federal Prosecutors: Let There Be Light , Yale Law Journal (2009)
American Bar Association, Crossing the Line: Responding to Prosecutorial Misconduct (2008)
James K. Robinson, Restoring Public Confidence in the Fairness of the Department of Justice’s Criminal Justice Function , 2-2 Harv. L. Pol’y Rev. 237 (2008)
Robert P. Mosteller, Exculpatory Evidence, Ethics, and the Road to the Disbarment of Mike Nifong: The Critical Importance of Full Open-File Discovery (2008)
Federal Judicial Center, Brady v. Maryland Material in the United States District Courts: Rules, Orders, and Policies (2007)
Bennett L. Gershman, Litigating Brady v. Maryland: Games Prosecutors Play , 57 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 13 (2007)
Jenny Roberts, Too Little, Too Late: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, The Duty to Investigate, And Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases , 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1097 (2003-2004).
Peter J. Henning, Prosecutorial Misconduct And Constitutional Remedies , 77-3 Wash. U. L.Q. 713 (1999)
Richard A. Rosen, Disciplinary Sanctions Against Prosecutors for Brady Violations: A Paper Tiger , N.C. L. Rev. (1987)