NACDL presents its Judicial Recognition Award to acknowledge judges who demonstrate a continuing dedication to protecting democratic principles and the fundamental rights of individuals within American society.
|2019||Judge L. Felipe “Phil” Restrepo||Pennsylvania|
|2015||Judge John Gleeson||New York|
|2010||Rt. Hon. Beverley McLachlin, P.C.||Ottawa|
|2010||Judge Mary Lou Robinson||Texas|
|2009||Judge Lewis A. Kaplan||New York|
|2008||Judge Morris S. Arnold||Arkansas|
|2008||Judge Shira A. Scheindlin||New York|
|2007||Judge Boyce F. Martin, Jr.||Kentucky|
|2006||Judge William M. Hoeveler||Florida|
|2005||Judge Matthew J. Perry, Jr.||South Carolina|
|2004||Judge Gilbert S. Merritt||Tennessee|
|2004||Judge Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.||Tennessee|
|2001||Judge Nancy Gertner||Massachusetts|
|1999||Judge Gerald Kogan||Florida|
|1998||Judge William W. Daniel||Georgia|
|1996||Judge Patrick F. Kelly||Kansas|
|1994||Judge Jack B. Weinstein||New York|
|1994||Judge Daniel W. Moylan||Maryland|
|1994||Judge Juan G. Burciaga||New Mexico|
|1992||Judge Marilyn Hall Patel||California|
|1992||Judge Wiliam M. Kelsay||California|
|1992||Judge Mary Lupo||Florida|
|1987||Judge John L. Kane, Jr.||Colorado|
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys