Federal money laundering laws cover too much peripheral conduct that the statutes and their draconian guidelines were not meant to address. Once a tool for drug or racketeering cases, these laws are now applied to a wide range of activities, including routine business transactions. As interpreted and applied, the current law is a cruel trap for unwary individuals and businesses that inflicts felony convictions, harsh and inflexible prison sentences, and ruinous asset forfeiture. The Department of Justice has failed to reign in this darling of the prosecutor’s nursery, allowing prosecutors to use the laws to coerce unfair plea agreements.
NACDL has proposed several technical statutory amendments to rectify the money laundering regime’s most serious flaws by simplifying and clarifying current law, facilitating compliance efforts by individuals and businesses, and by focusing federal law enforcement on serious misconduct. In addition, NACDL has worked to prevent Congress from expanding the federal money laundering statutes further.
Provided below are a sampling of news stories on federal money laundering, as well as the reports submitted by the Department of Justice, as required by the Fraud Enforcement & Recovery Act (FERA), to Congress detailing the number of authorization requests for prosecution where the money laundering charges merges with the underlying conduct, the approvals and denials, and the number of unauthorized prosecutions.
DOJ Reports to Congress As Required By FERA
DOJ FERA Report Submitted to Congress for May 2013 to May 2014 (April 21, 2015)
DOJ FERA Report Submitted to Congress for May 2012 to May 2013 (March 11, 2014)
DOJ FERA Report Submitted to Congress for May 2011 to May 2012 (March 12, 2013)
DOJ FERA Report Submitted to Congress for May 2010 to May 2011 (March 19, 2012)
DOJ FERA Report Submitted to Congress for May 2009 to May 2010 (Sept. 21, 2010)
News of Interest
“Border Businesses Lose Bank Accounts Amid Money Laundering ,” NPR, January 4, 2015.
Bitcoin entrepreneur sentenced to two years for role in money laundering scheme , The Guardian , December 22, 2014 [Indictment ].
FFIEC Releases Revised Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) Examination Manual (Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council) , The National Law Review , December 20, 2014
Money laundering cases could bring feds $70 million , San Antonio Express , December 13, 2014.
Continue reading below
Featured Products
Challenging Digital Forensic Evidence & Software
This program arms defense attorneys with the legal strategies and technical understanding needed to challenge software evidence at every stage: expert qualifications, reliability under Rule 702, confrontation rights, discovery, due process, and more. You'll learn how to cross-examine government witnesses who rely on black-box technology they don’t truly understand—and how to force the court to take a closer look at what's really driving forensic conclusions. Learn how STRmix, TruleIO, ShotSpotter, and AI-generated sketches are marketed as scientifically validated, yet often evade scrutiny.
Objections That Stick! How to Exclude, Preserve, and Persuade
If you’re not objecting, you might be conceding—learn how to stop giving ground.
This program delivers practical strategies for making effective objections in criminal trials, especially drug cases. Learn how to challenge hearsay, 404(b) evidence, improper opinions, and prejudicial testimony. You’ll get objection language, methods for preserving error, and tactics for handling misconduct in closing arguments. With real-world examples and trial-tested tools, this program helps defense attorneys sharpen courtroom advocacy and protect the record for appeal.
Combating the "Rape Myth" Expert: Excluding & Diffusing Expert Testimony
When the prosecution uses a “rape myth” expert to sway the jury, do you know how to stop them—and turn their science against them?
This program, based on a real trial, gives defense attorneys a practical roadmap to challenge and exclude biased psychological testimony. You’ll get sample voir dire, motion language, Daubert strategies, and tips for exposing flawed methodology and narrowing testimony. Whether you're aiming to exclude the expert or limit their impact, this session equips you with the tools to protect your client and assert control in the courtroom.
Pattern Cross-Examination for Digital Forensic Experts
This guide provides ready-to-use cross-examination questions, categorized by artifact type and case theme—from cell phone towers to deleted texts to smart devices and cloud forensics. Whether you’re handling a case involving child exploitation, stalking, or online fraud, this book delivers practical patterns designed to highlight sloppy forensics, bias, tool limitations, and assumptions of intent or identity. Defense attorneys don’t need a computer science degree—they need strategy, control, and the right questions to challenge the illusion of digital certainty in court.
Using Chat GPT in Criminal Cases - Writing Better Prompts
Want a motion written in plain language but grounded in Tennessee case law? Need a summary of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence with primary and secondary citations? This is where you learn how to get that—on demand, and with far less editing. This training is designed specifically for attorneys—busy professionals who need fast, accurate, and case-relevant AI support. Whether you’re drafting motions, brainstorming legal strategy, summarizing complex case law, or preparing cross-examinations, the quality of your AI output comes down to one thing: how you ask for it.
Alcohol, Blackouts and Consent in Sex Cases
This comprehensive training program provides defense attorneys with a rigorous, science-backed approach to dismantling prosecutorial narratives, exposing unreliable testimony, and ensuring that juries are properly educated on the complexities of memory, intoxication, and consent. You'll explores critical mistakes and misconceptions encountered in these cases, including errors in memory reconstruction after an event, incorrect inferences, cognitive schemas, suggestibility, contamination and misinformation, mistakes of fact and more.
Overcoming the Presumption of Guilt and Defining Reasonable Doubt
Reasonable Doubt, what is it?
In order to win criminal cases, the defense practitioner must object to a reasonable doubt standard that lowers the burden of guilt. This program will discuss proven methods to argue and define reasonable doubt persuasively to a jury. You’ll learn how define reasonable doubt using metaphors and hypothetical scenarios that force juries to dispute the evidence, conflicts in the evidence, or even lack of evidence in your case.
The DIY of DNA: Exoneration Through DNA Evidence
This presentation might be the first time you’re truly able to truly grasp the fundamentals of DNA evidence. This critical presentation blends real-world storytelling with clear, practical instruction—making DNA evidence finally feel accessible, even to non-scientists—while inspiring attorneys to dig deeper, ask smarter questions, and approach forensic science with newfound confidence. You’ll learn how to identify and interpret electropherograms, understand autosomal vs. Y-STR testing, and recognize the limits of DNA evidence—particularly when it involves partial or mixed samples.
U.S. Money-Laundering Probe Touches Putin's Inner Circle , The Wall Street Journal , November 5, 2014.
Marijuana Money Is Still A Pot Of Trouble For Banks , Forbes , September 18, 2014.
FedEx Money-Laundering Charge Adds Pressure to Drug Case , Bloomberg , August 19, 2014.
Federal grand jury indicts former Holy Cow CEO on fraud, money-laundering charges , Sacramento Business Journal , August 15, 2014.
US uses new tactic to crack money laundering cases , CNBC , July 9, 2014.
Obama administration clears banks to accept funds from legal marijuana dealers , The Washington Post , February 14, 2014.
HSBC to Pay $1.92 Billion to Settle Charges of Money Laundering , The New York Times , December 10, 2012.
Banks Financing Mexico Gangs Admitted in Wells Fargo Deal , Bloomberg , June 29, 2010.
Tiffany Joslyn, FERA's Silver Lining - An Account of NACDL's Efforts Combating Overcriminalization , The Champion (August 2009).
"Kuehne Case 'Hanging on by a Thread' ," Daily Business Review , January 5, 2009.
"Judge in Ben Kuehne Case Finds Feds' Charge 'Disturbing' ," The Wall Street Journal, December 1, 2008.
"Scales of Justice: The Right to Counsel vs. the Need to Bar Tainted Legal Fees ," The Wall Street Journal, November 20, 2008.
"Defense attorneys criticize charges ," SunSentinel.com, September 6, 2008.
Peter Hardy, The Supreme Court Provides Post-Conviction Opportunities to Defendants Convicted of Money Laundering , September 5, 2008.
NACDL Money Laundering Task Force Report, Proposals to Reform the Federal Money Laundering Statutes , August 1, 2001.