DPAs & NPAs

Deferred Prosecution Agreements (“DPAs”) and Non-Prosecution Agreements (“NPAs”) are pre-trial diversion contracts entered into by the government—usually the Department of Justice—and a potential corporate defendant. Under the terms of a DPA, the government files criminal charges against a company, but holds prosecution of the charges in abeyance until the company satisfies the terms of the DPA. Unlike with DPAs, no charges are filed against companies that enter NPAs so long as they comply with specified sanctions.

News and resources discussing efforts to change the manner in which DPAs and NPAs operate, along with several actual DPAs and NPAs, are provided below.

News and Commentary

DPAs and Plea Agreements: The Tradeoffs,” Corporate Counsel, January 5, 2015.

The Justice Department is now in your boardroom, in a big way, Fortune, December 22, 2014

Assistant Attorney General Caldwell’s Unconvincing Defense of DPAs / NPAs, FCPA Professor, December, 8, 2014

“DPAs” Have Arrived in England: The Proof of the Pudding Is in the Eating, Raymond L. Sweigart, Pillsbury, February 11, 2014

The Shadow Lengthens: The Continuing Threat of Regulation by Prosecution, James Copland & Isaac Gorodetski, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, February 2014

Regulators Finding New Ways to Use DPAs, NPAs, Corporate Counsel, July 12, 2013

Do NPAs and DPAs Deter?, FCPA Professor, March 12, 2013

Continue reading below

Assistant Attorney General Breuer’s Unconvincing Defense of DPAs / NPAs, FCPA Professor, September 17, 2012

FCPA Enforcement: Why Corporations Support DPAs & NPAs, Corporate Compliance Insights, April 12, 2012

NPAs, DPAs, and the FCPA, FCPA Professor, February 9, 2010

Proposal Seeks More Oversight of Justice Department's Pre-Trial Diversion Agreements, Shana-Tara Regon, NACDL, Washington Legal Foundation, September 25, 2009

Continue reading below

Featured Products

Alert: Differences in DPAs and NPAs Narrowing?, Compliance Week, July 9, 2009

Resources

Brandon L. Garrett and Jon Ashley, Corporate Prosecution Registry, University of Virginia School of Law

The Shadow Lengthens: The Continuing Threat of Regulation by Prosecution, James Copland & Isaac Gorodetski, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, February 2014

2013 Year-End Update on Corporate NPAs and DPAs, Gibson Dunn, January 7, 2014

2013 Mid-Year Update on Corporate Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, July 24, 2013

2012 Mid-Year Update on Corporate Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements, Gibson Dunn, July 10, 2012

The Shadow Regulatory State: The Rise of Deferred Prosecution Agreements, James Copland, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, May 2012

Memo from Acting Deputy Attorney General Gary G. Grindler, Additional Guidance on the Use of Monitors in DPAs and NPAs with Corporations (May 25, 2010) (Grindler Memo)

Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Requesters, Corporate Crime: DOJ Has Taken Steps to Better Track Its Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements, but Should Evaluate Effectiveness (January 2010)

Memo from Acting Deputy Attorney General Craig S. Morford, Selection and Use of Monitors in DPAs and NPAs with Corporations (March 7, 2008) (Morford Memo)

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/StayInformed/Champion/ChampionCovers/March-April-2025.jpg?ext=.jpg

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/amicus.png

    Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/newsrelease.png

    News Release ~ Law Enforcement Executive Order

    NACDL Warns Executive Order's Dangerous Overreach Undermines Community Safety and Trust in Police – Washington, DC (April 29, 2025) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) expressed deep concern regarding the Executive Order titled "Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens," cautioning that several of its proposals represent a dangerous overreach that undermines these goals by jeopardizing individual rights and the legitimacy of law enforcement in the eyes of the community.

  4. Event
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Learn/nacdlcleinstitute/2025_Post-Dobbs_Trial_Tactics_2025-02-26_v02_Event-Listing_2.jpg?ext=.jpg

    Trial Tactics for Pregnancy-Related Cases: Skills for Every Defender

    LOCATION: The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, TX
    DATE: May 16-17, 2025
    COST: FREE (registration is required)
    CLE Credit: Up to 14.5 credits 

  5. Webinar
    /assets/img/nacdl_og.png

    Collaborative Approaches to Appellate Defense: Recognizing Clients' Legal Expertise

    WHEN: Thursday, May 8, 3:00-4:30pm ET / 12:00-1:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free