- Comments with FAMM and JAN to BOP on Proposed First Step Act Earned Time Credits Rule (January 2021)
- Statement to Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement on Accountability and Reform (June 2020)
- Comments on DOJ First Step Act Implementation Tools (September 2019)
- Letter to Attorney General Barr on FIRST Step Act Implementation (March 2019)
- Comments to DOJ on Federal Review of State Capital Post-Conviction Cases (March 2012)
- Comments to DOJ on Federal Review of State Capital Post-Conviction Cases (June 2011)
- Letter to the Department of Justice on Preventing and Responding to Prison Rape (April 2011)
- Letter to the Department of Justice on Preventing and Responding to Prison Rape (May 2010)
- Letter with FAMM to BOP on Rule Changes to Reentry (December 2008)
- Comments to DOJ on Proposed Regulations in Capital Cases (September 2007)
- Comments to DOJ on the Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification (July 2007)
- Comments to DOJ on Rules to Retroactively Apply the Adam Walsh Act (April 2007)
- Letter on BOP Proposed Reduction in Sentence For Medical Reasons (February 2007)
Explore keywords to find information
This is a sponsored ad
MyCase
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Featured Products
-
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
-
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
-
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
-
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.