Endorsing Proposition 34 to End the Death Penalty in California

NACDL endorses Proposition 34 as a more effective, just, and cost-efficient method of preventing, solving, and punishing crime.

WHEREAS, the Savings Accountability and Full Enforcement (SAFE) for California ballot initiative would replace the death penalty in California with life without the possibility of parole,

WHEREAS, the SAFE California Act will appear on the November 2012 ballot as Proposition 34,

WHEREAS, “Executing the Will of Voters?: A Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Death Penalty Debacle,” a study conducted by U.S. District Judge Arthur Alacon and Loyola Law School Los Angeles professor Paula Mitchell, determined that the State of California currently spends more than $184 million each year on its capital punishment system,

WHEREAS, California spends this exorbitant amount of money to retain the death penalty although the state has executed only 13 people in 33 years,

WHEREAS, 46% of murders and 56% of rapes in California go unsolved each year,

WHEREAS, Proposition 34 seeks to balance California’s spending and public safety priorities by directing $100 million currently being spent on the death penalty in California to law enforcement agencies to help solve open homicide and rape cases,  

WHEREAS, Proposition 34 also requires those convicted of murder to work and pay restitution into a state victim compensation fund, 

WHEREAS, NACDL has a long-standing, vigorous, and vocal opposition to the imposition of the death penalty for crime,

WHEREAS, Proposition 34 advances the principles of justice championed by NACDL,

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, NACDL endorses Proposition 34 as a more effective, just, and cost-efficient method of preventing, solving, and punishing crime.

San Francisco, CA

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/StayInformed/Champion/ChampionCovers/March-April-2025.jpg?ext=.jpg

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/amicus.png

    Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/newsrelease.png

    News Release ~ Law Enforcement Executive Order

    NACDL Warns Executive Order's Dangerous Overreach Undermines Community Safety and Trust in Police – Washington, DC (April 29, 2025) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) expressed deep concern regarding the Executive Order titled "Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens," cautioning that several of its proposals represent a dangerous overreach that undermines these goals by jeopardizing individual rights and the legitimacy of law enforcement in the eyes of the community.

  4. Event
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Learn/nacdlcleinstitute/2025_Post-Dobbs_Trial_Tactics_2025-02-26_v02_Event-Listing_2.jpg?ext=.jpg

    Trial Tactics for Pregnancy-Related Cases: Skills for Every Defender

    LOCATION: The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, TX
    DATE: May 16-17, 2025
    COST: FREE (registration is required)
    CLE Credit: Up to 14.5 credits 

  5. Webinar
    /assets/img/nacdl_og.png

    Collaborative Approaches to Appellate Defense: Recognizing Clients' Legal Expertise

    WHEN: Thursday, May 8, 3:00-4:30pm ET / 12:00-1:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products