Following community outcry regarding instances of police misconduct and violence, many communities call for the deployment of body cameras as a means to monitor and document events. As more and more law enforcement agencies have added body cameras, the use of these devices has come under increasing scrunity on a number of fronts. Issues range from those surrounding practical issues such as when the cameras are (and are not) engaged, how long footage is retained, and how the information is transmitted; their impact on prosecutor and defender workload; evidentiary issues arising from narration and viewpoint bais; questions surrounding public access to footage; and the use of cameras to engage in mass survelliance.
Additional Materials General Information: Body Worn Cameras and the Courts , National Center for State Courts (2016)Body Worn Camera Laws Database, National Conference of State Legislatures:Considering Police Body Cameras , 128 Harv. L. Rev. 1794 (2015)Justice Visualized , Mary D. Fan, 50 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 2017Police Body Worn Cameras , Seth Stoughton, 96 N.C. L. Rev. 1363 (2018) Policing Body Worn Cameras: A Policy Scorecard , Upturn (2017) Problems with Juror Bias in Viewing Body-Camera Video Evidence , Excited Utterance: Evidence and Proof podcast, Episode #72, (July 2019)Video Evidence a Primer for Prosecutors ,BJA:(2016)
Evidentiary Issues :Machine Testimony , A. Roth, 126 Yale L. J. 1972 (2018) Missing Police Body Camera Videos: Remedies, Evidentiary Fairness, and Automatic Activation , Mary Fan, 52 U. Ga. L. Rev. 57No Tape, No Testimony: How Courts Can Ensure Responsible Use of Body Cameras , ACLU of Mass., UC Berkeley School of Law (2016)Policing the Admissibility of Body Camera Evidence , Bellin and Pemberton, 87 Fordham L. Rev. 1429 (2019)When Discretion to Record Becomes Assertive: Body Camera Footage as Hearsay , Note, 20 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 4, 1259 (2018)
Camera Perspective and Playback Speed :Body Camera Obscura: The Semiotics of Police Video , C. Morrison, 45 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 791 (2017)Cross-Examining Film , J. Silbey, 8 U.MD L. J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 17, (2008)Hidden Biases of Cameras, Slate , Aug. 2015How Body Cameras Distort Real Life , New York Times, Opinion, August 8, 2019Police Body Cameras: What Do You See? New York Times, April 4, 2016The Camera Perspective Bias: A Case Study , 4 J. Investigative Psychol. & Offender Profiling, 199 (2007)The Illusion of Accuracy: How Body-Worn Camera Footage Can Distort Evidence , Upturn (2017)Slow Motion Increases Perceived Intent , E. Caruso, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2016); see also YouTube Video of same titleTruth, Lies, and Meaning in Slow Motion Images, S. Rogers, Psychocinematics, (2013)
Featured Products
Challenging Carceral Forensic Software
This program arms defense attorneys with the legal strategies and technical understanding needed to challenge software evidence at every stage: expert qualifications, reliability under Rule 702, confrontation rights, discovery, due process, and more. You'll learn how to cross-examine government witnesses who rely on black-box technology they don’t truly understand—and how to force the court to take a closer look at what's really driving forensic conclusions. Learn how STRmix, TruleIO, ShotSpotter, and AI-generated sketches are marketed as scientifically validated, yet often evade scrutiny.
Pattern Cross-Examination for Digital Forensic Experts
This guide provides ready-to-use cross-examination questions, categorized by artifact type and case theme—from cell phone towers to deleted texts to smart devices and cloud forensics. Whether you’re handling a case involving child exploitation, stalking, or online fraud, this book delivers practical patterns designed to highlight sloppy forensics, bias, tool limitations, and assumptions of intent or identity. Defense attorneys don’t need a computer science degree—they need strategy, control, and the right questions to challenge the illusion of digital certainty in court.
Using Chat GPT in Criminal Cases - Writing Better Prompts
Want a motion written in plain language but grounded in Tennessee case law? Need a summary of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence with primary and secondary citations? This is where you learn how to get that—on demand, and with far less editing. This training is designed specifically for attorneys—busy professionals who need fast, accurate, and case-relevant AI support. Whether you’re drafting motions, brainstorming legal strategy, summarizing complex case law, or preparing cross-examinations, the quality of your AI output comes down to one thing: how you ask for it.
Alcohol, Blackouts and Consent in Sex Cases
This comprehensive training program provides defense attorneys with a rigorous, science-backed approach to dismantling prosecutorial narratives, exposing unreliable testimony, and ensuring that juries are properly educated on the complexities of memory, intoxication, and consent. You'll explores critical mistakes and misconceptions encountered in these cases, including errors in memory reconstruction after an event, incorrect inferences, cognitive schemas, suggestibility, contamination and misinformation, mistakes of fact and more.
Overcoming the Presumption of Guilt and Defining Reasonable Doubt
Reasonable Doubt, what is it?
In order to win criminal cases, the defense practitioner must object to a reasonable doubt standard that lowers the burden of guilt. This program will discuss proven methods to argue and define reasonable doubt persuasively to a jury. You’ll learn how define reasonable doubt using metaphors and hypothetical scenarios that force juries to dispute the evidence, conflicts in the evidence, or even lack of evidence in your case.
The DIY of DNA: Exoneration Through DNA Evidence
This presentation might be the first time you’re truly able to truly grasp the fundamentals of DNA evidence. This critical presentation blends real-world storytelling with clear, practical instruction—making DNA evidence finally feel accessible, even to non-scientists—while inspiring attorneys to dig deeper, ask smarter questions, and approach forensic science with newfound confidence. You’ll learn how to identify and interpret electropherograms, understand autosomal vs. Y-STR testing, and recognize the limits of DNA evidence—particularly when it involves partial or mixed samples.
