This Task Force was created to study the current weaknesses with, and to draft and propose reforms to, the Sentencing Guidelines for economic crimes. The Task Force includes three NACDL representatives, including Kyle O'Dowd, NACDL's Associate Executive Director of Policy.
The Task Force has proposed a rewrite of the federal “fraud guideline” (USSG 2B1.1). The first draft of this proposal was unveiled and discussed extensively at the Sentencing Commission’s Economic Crime Symposium in New York in September 2013. Initial reactions from most judges and practitioners (and even a couple commissioners) were very favorable. The proposal was published in The Champion, accompanied by commentary from Task Force member James Felman,and elsewhere in hopes of eliciting support, debate and constructive criticism.
The Task Force revised the proposal based on this feedback and released a second draft of its proposal in May 2014 and a final draft in November 2014. The proposal drafts, along with Felman's commentary published in the Champion, are available below. In addition, some defense attorneys and courts have begun citing and relying upon the proposal in criminal sentencing proceedings. NACDL is attempting to collect materials from such cases and make them available on this page. Sentencing memos and transcripts from two such cases are available below.
Materials from the ABA Task Force
"A Report on Behalf of the American Bar Association Task Force on the Reform of Federal Sentencing For Economic Crimes," by James E. Felman, The Champion, November 2013.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys