The Champion

May 2015 , Page 34 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

McFadden v. United States: Deconstructing Synthetic Drug Prosecutions

By Jeffrey C. Grass

One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results. 

―— Milton Friedman1  

In order to convict an individual of distribution of a controlled substance analogue, must the government prove that the individual knew that the substance constituted a controlled substance analogue, or is it sufficient merely to prove that the individual distributed the substance with the intention that it be for human consumption?

Law Enforcement Activity

Since January 2014, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has executed Project Synergy Phase II, an ongoing operation targeting suspected synthetic drug traffickers throughout the United States.2 The DEA, Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, and local authorities have served arrest and search warrants in 35 states and five countries, seizing more than $5

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
login

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us
ad