☰ In this section

The Champion

September-October 2012 , Page 38 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

The Willfulness Element of a False Statement Charge

By Paul Mogin

Defense lawyers and civil liberties lawyers have long recognized the risk of unfairness and overreaching posed by 18 U.S.C. § 1001, the federal false statement statute.1 Recently, however, concern about § 1001 has surfaced in other quarters as well. Two years ago, Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the D.C. Circuit described the statute as “ever-metastasizing” and warned that “§ 1001 prosecutions can pose a risk of abuse and injustice.”2 Earlier this year, Judge Grady Jolly of the Fifth Circuit protested that his colleagues had “taken leave of a common sense application of the law”3 in sustaining a false statement conviction, and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Stephen Saltzburg declared that “[t]here is no statute out there that’s more pernicious.”4  

A person violates § 1001 if, “in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States,” he “knowingly and willfully” conceals a material fact by a “trick,

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us